But you could say the same thing going from 3.5 to 5. The game core is the same, just some tweaks and tuning. And if both are available at the same time, will anyone EVER play a 2024 Moon Druid?
Honestly... yes? It's probably worse in tier 1, where the 2014 moon druid is notoriously overpowered, but in tier 2 and 3 I think I'd prefer the 2024.
I don't feel like this is different at all really. There's some tweaks and tuning, but the game core is the same. This is 100% not a new edition.
But you could say the same thing going from 3.5 to 5. The game core is the same, just some tweaks and tuning. And if both are available at the same time, will anyone EVER play a 2024 Moon Druid?
It's why I call this 5.5. As far as moon, I wouldn't touch it in 2014, so...
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Any time an unfathomably powerful entity sweeps in and offers godlike rewards in return for just a few teensy favors, it’s a scam. Unless it’s me. I’d never lie to you, reader dearest.
You cant really call this 5.5E, because there is no significant changes to the 5E formula like there was between 3E and 3.5E. Many have pointed this out earlier. Also, with WotC moving away from editions, this is more like a patch to the game--to use videogaming terms.
Any time an unfathomably powerful entity sweeps in and offers godlike rewards in return for just a few teensy favors, it’s a scam. Unless it’s me. I’d never lie to you, reader dearest.
You cant really call this 5.5E, because there is no significant changes to the 5E formula like there was between 3E and 3.5E.
Eh, it's on the same scale as AD&D 1e to 2e, 3e to 3.5e, or 4e to 4e Essentials. Which mostly demonstrates that naming conventions for D&D editions are incredibly inconsistent.
You cant really call this 5.5E, because there is no significant changes to the 5E formula like there was between 3E and 3.5E. Many have pointed this out earlier. Also, with WotC moving away from editions, this is more like a patch to the game--to use videogaming terms.
using FFXIV as an example,
We are currently on Patch 7.01 each major update gets a tenths column update.
If we use video game logic, and each rules supplement is a full patch and each adventure is a small patch
32 source books, and 39 adventures.
Since not all the source books would be considered a full patch, lets just take the important ones. (I copied and pasted from my inventory here on DnDB, sadly my reading glasses just got destroyed and I'm having difficulties reading ... using my phones camera to zoom to read.)
SWORD COAST ADVENTURER’S GUIDE
VOLO'S GUIDE TO MONSTERS
XANATHAR'S GUIDE TO EVERYTHING
WAYFINDER'S GUIDE TO EBERRON
GUILDMASTERS' GUIDE TO RAVNICA
TASHA’S CAULDRON OF EVERYTHING
FIZBAN'S TREASURY OF DRAGONS
STRIXHAVEN: A CURRICULUM OF CHAOS
SPELLJAMMER: ADVENTURES IN SPACE (I shouldn't count this, but it technically counts)
BIGBY PRESENTS: GLORY OF THE GIANTS
PLANESCAPE: ADVENTURES IN THE MULTIVERSE
THE BOOK OF MANY THINGS
so using video game patch logic. they had to start on 5.0.01 with Sword Coast, and Book of Many Things would be 5.0.12... the 2024 books would then be 5.1.00
The logic would be the build numbers ... your video games always have a build number, with builds 0.12.122 <- being beta and prior to launch, and 1.0.01 being after launch. Sometimes they toss letter codes in as well...
btw Microsoft does this as well... I'm on Win 11 22631.3880 <- crazy build number.
So yeah, this is why 5.24 and 5.5 seem logical for the community to call it.
The problem with 5.24 is that all the core rulebooks will not be out in 2024.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Any time an unfathomably powerful entity sweeps in and offers godlike rewards in return for just a few teensy favors, it’s a scam. Unless it’s me. I’d never lie to you, reader dearest.
Can you multiclass between the '14 and '24 versions? Like take a '24 Monk multiclassed with a '14 Moon Druid to make an absolutely broken character?
i don't see why not. 5.14 and 5.24 characters don't have any mechanical difference that makes them incompatible. They still use the same proficiency bonus progression.
The problem with 5.24 is that all the core rulebooks will not be out in 2024.
2024 Player's Handbook – 17 September 2024
2024 Dungeon Master's Guide – 12 November 2024
2024 Monster Manual – 18 February 2025
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Click ✨ HERE ✨ For My Youtube Videos featuring Guides, Tips & Tricks for using D&D Beyond. Need help with Homebrew? Check out ✨ thisFAQ/Guide thread ✨ by IamSposta.
The problem with 5.24 is that all the core rulebooks will not be out in 2024.
That’s not a problem at all. The Monster Manual, which is the only one not actually being published in 2024, is still explicitly and officially being referred to as the 2024 Monster Manual.
Can you multiclass between the '14 and '24 versions? Like take a '24 Monk multiclassed with a '14 Moon Druid to make an absolutely broken character?
i don't see why not. 5.14 and 5.24 characters don't have any mechanical differencethat makes them incompatible. They still use the same proficiency bonus progression.
This is just disingenuous. Half of the classes have been fundamentally changed (5 now get their subclasses at different levels, Warlocks and Monks have been pretty much completely reworked).
[SNIP]
You've highlighted the wrong part in a way that I think is more egregious that your same claims of disingenuity. What they said was (without selective highlighting)
5.14 and 5.24 characters don't have any mechanical difference that makes them incompatible.
They're not saying there are no mechanical differences
They are saying there are no mechanical differences that would make them incompatible from the specific perspective of multiclassing
I can say with some confidence (at least when it comes to the monk, wizard, and paladin classes) that this is factually true. There are no mechanical differences that'd make multiclassing a 2014 class with a 2024 class.
The problem with the "It's just a patch" argument is that you cannot pick and choose which version of a video game patch you play (at least not if you are playing with other players). No online video game allows players to play together on two different patch versions. In order to play, you have to update to the latest patch.
Can you multiclass between the '14 and '24 versions? Like take a '24 Monk multiclassed with a '14 Moon Druid to make an absolutely broken character?
i don't see why not. 5.14 and 5.24 characters don't have any mechanical differencethat makes them incompatible. They still use the same proficiency bonus progression.
This is just disingenuous. Half of the classes have been fundamentally changed (5 now get their subclasses at different levels, Warlocks and Monks have been pretty much completely reworked).
As already pointed out by Davyd. You bolded the wrong part. The 5.14 Monk and the 5.24 Monk are different. But there is no change in the mechanics that would make multiclassing incompatible. A mechanical change would be, for example, if they would remove the Proficiency Bonus progression in the 5.24 version for a skill point style progression. THEN it would be incompatible. The core mechanics and rules are not changed in that regard. You still add your proficiency bonus to stuff, the proficiency bonus is still calculated by total level not class level. DCs are still 8 + mod + PB.
As for what spells to use. I would say as a general advice: a 5.14 class uses the 5.14 spells, a 5.24 class uses the 5.24 spells. If you multiclass both you can still separate it that way if you like. Having a 5.14 Guidance and a 5.24 Guidance available (or any other updated spell) might even make for some interesting builds. Personally, i will probably switch most stuff to the 5.24 versions, as i like to play with the most up to date options.
Multiclassing a 2014 class into a 2024 class to gain access to two versions of the same spell would be really interesting and fun as a concept. Hmmmmmm
Multiclassing a 2014 class into a 2024 class to gain access to two versions of the same spell would be really interesting and fun as a concept. Hmmmmmm
Isn't that not allowed RAW? If it was, one could multiclass the same class for additional subclasses.
But that leads into an issue here.... are the 2024 versions really compatible with their 2014 counterparts?
Isn't that not allowed RAW? If it was, one could multiclass the same class for additional subclasses.
But that leads into an issue here.... are the 2024 versions really compatible with their 2014 counterparts?
I don't think he meant multiclassing the SAME class. It sounded more like 2014 class A + 2024 class B.
Not sure why it would have to be a 2014 class to have access to a 2014 spell, though... or else that is a lot less backwards compatible. Does a wizard have to check the copyright date on any 'wizard' spell they find a copy of, to see if they can understand it or not?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Honestly... yes? It's probably worse in tier 1, where the 2014 moon druid is notoriously overpowered, but in tier 2 and 3 I think I'd prefer the 2024.
DD 5.24
Vifarc Cordelibre, the most unique ranger-tank, the wood-elf heavy-ranger.
It's why I call this 5.5. As far as moon, I wouldn't touch it in 2014, so...
Any time an unfathomably powerful entity sweeps in and offers godlike rewards in return for just a few teensy favors, it’s a scam. Unless it’s me. I’d never lie to you, reader dearest.
Tasha
You cant really call this 5.5E, because there is no significant changes to the 5E formula like there was between 3E and 3.5E. Many have pointed this out earlier. Also, with WotC moving away from editions, this is more like a patch to the game--to use videogaming terms.
They pointed it out, but I disagree with them.
Any time an unfathomably powerful entity sweeps in and offers godlike rewards in return for just a few teensy favors, it’s a scam. Unless it’s me. I’d never lie to you, reader dearest.
Tasha
Eh, it's on the same scale as AD&D 1e to 2e, 3e to 3.5e, or 4e to 4e Essentials. Which mostly demonstrates that naming conventions for D&D editions are incredibly inconsistent.
using FFXIV as an example,
We are currently on Patch 7.01 each major update gets a tenths column update.
ie 2.0, 2.1, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.5 .... 7.0, 7.01
If we use video game logic, and each rules supplement is a full patch and each adventure is a small patch
32 source books, and 39 adventures.
Since not all the source books would be considered a full patch, lets just take the important ones. (I copied and pasted from my inventory here on DnDB, sadly my reading glasses just got destroyed and I'm having difficulties reading ... using my phones camera to zoom to read.)
so using video game patch logic. they had to start on 5.0.01 with Sword Coast, and Book of Many Things would be 5.0.12... the 2024 books would then be 5.1.00
The logic would be the build numbers ... your video games always have a build number, with builds 0.12.122 <- being beta and prior to launch, and 1.0.01 being after launch. Sometimes they toss letter codes in as well...
btw Microsoft does this as well... I'm on Win 11 22631.3880 <- crazy build number.
So yeah, this is why 5.24 and 5.5 seem logical for the community to call it.
The problem with 5.24 is that all the core rulebooks will not be out in 2024.
Any time an unfathomably powerful entity sweeps in and offers godlike rewards in return for just a few teensy favors, it’s a scam. Unless it’s me. I’d never lie to you, reader dearest.
Tasha
Two out of three ain’t bad.
40 of 94 votes are for 5.5 so I think no matter what wotc insists most fans call it 5-24 or 5.5
The first one will be, an that is the most important one that all others will be based on.
i don't see why not. 5.14 and 5.24 characters don't have any mechanical difference that makes them incompatible. They still use the same proficiency bonus progression.
2024 Player's Handbook – 17 September 2024
2024 Dungeon Master's Guide – 12 November 2024
2024 Monster Manual – 18 February 2025
Click ✨ HERE ✨ For My Youtube Videos featuring Guides, Tips & Tricks for using D&D Beyond.
Need help with Homebrew? Check out ✨ this FAQ/Guide thread ✨ by IamSposta.
That’s not a problem at all. The Monster Manual, which is the only one not actually being published in 2024, is still explicitly and officially being referred to as the 2024 Monster Manual.
You've highlighted the wrong part in a way that I think is more egregious that your same claims of disingenuity. What they said was (without selective highlighting)
They're not saying there are no mechanical differences
They are saying there are no mechanical differences that would make them incompatible from the specific perspective of multiclassing
I can say with some confidence (at least when it comes to the monk, wizard, and paladin classes) that this is factually true. There are no mechanical differences that'd make multiclassing a 2014 class with a 2024 class.
Find my D&D Beyond articles here
As already pointed out by Davyd. You bolded the wrong part. The 5.14 Monk and the 5.24 Monk are different. But there is no change in the mechanics that would make multiclassing incompatible. A mechanical change would be, for example, if they would remove the Proficiency Bonus progression in the 5.24 version for a skill point style progression. THEN it would be incompatible. The core mechanics and rules are not changed in that regard. You still add your proficiency bonus to stuff, the proficiency bonus is still calculated by total level not class level. DCs are still 8 + mod + PB.
As for what spells to use. I would say as a general advice: a 5.14 class uses the 5.14 spells, a 5.24 class uses the 5.24 spells. If you multiclass both you can still separate it that way if you like. Having a 5.14 Guidance and a 5.24 Guidance available (or any other updated spell) might even make for some interesting builds. Personally, i will probably switch most stuff to the 5.24 versions, as i like to play with the most up to date options.
Multiclassing a 2014 class into a 2024 class to gain access to two versions of the same spell would be really interesting and fun as a concept. Hmmmmmm
Find my D&D Beyond articles here
Isn't that not allowed RAW? If it was, one could multiclass the same class for additional subclasses.
But that leads into an issue here.... are the 2024 versions really compatible with their 2014 counterparts?
I don't think he meant multiclassing the SAME class. It sounded more like 2014 class A + 2024 class B.
Not sure why it would have to be a 2014 class to have access to a 2014 spell, though... or else that is a lot less backwards compatible. Does a wizard have to check the copyright date on any 'wizard' spell they find a copy of, to see if they can understand it or not?