you read the title, should Mammon have an offical statblock?

dont lie, you had no clue Mammon was in DND. I don't blame you. he's mentioned ONCE in the write up on the 9 hells in the DMG. for the life of me, I cant find any other mention of him, even though he can do a little more than other devil lords, because he also deals in gold instead of souls, souls, and more souls. I like him, he deserves a statblock, like so many other devil lords

Someone did it, perhaps not officially

https://imgur.com/a/fuI3oIR

I think Zariel might be the only official Lord of the Nine with a stat block, which does make it kind of weird that so many demon princes have them.

Mammon has a stat block in Chains of Asmodeus (which, like all Extra Life charity products, despite being published by WotC, has a muddled connection with the rest of D&D).

I think demon lords are meant to be on par with gods. Therefore, no stat block, with very few exceptions.

Quote from Pantagruel666 >>

Mammon has a stat block in Chains of Asmodeus (which, like all Extra Life charity products, despite being published by WotC, has a muddled connection with the rest of D&D).

 Mammon had a stat block in Tome of Beasts 1 but lost that in translating over to DDB. hopefully they left him out because Chains is coming to DDB soon too?

Quote from rumloverum >>

Quote from Pantagruel666 >>

Mammon has a stat block in Chains of Asmodeus (which, like all Extra Life charity products, despite being published by WotC, has a muddled connection with the rest of D&D).

 Mammon had a stat block in Tome of Beasts 1 but lost that in translating over to DDB. hopefully they left him out because Chains is coming to DDB soon too?

 I suspect Wizards doesn't want stat blocks for characters that are already in D&D canon being provided by third parties (at least, not in a way that can be interpreted as official recognition of the variant stat block). That said, it would hardly shock me if Chains came to DDB.

Aahah! I knew that Mammon was in D&D. He was originally a Statblock in Tome of Beasts I think, CR 25. All of the Lords of the nine should have Statblocks, besides maybe Levistus for obvious reasons.

Quote from Mdhe >>

I think Zariel might be the only official Lord of the Nine with a stat block, which does make it kind of weird that so many demon princes have them.

yeah that is weird.

geryon, not currently a lord of the nine

moloch, not currently a lord of the nine

titivillus, despite running dis, is not a lord of the nine

huitjin, a hired gun for mephistopholes

we need lord of the nine statblocks

In the typical dnd setting like faerun. Yeah, give arch fiends a stat a block but  if your view of angels and demons  are as unfathomable biblical monstrosities representing abstract concepts like greed or lust then probably don't, instead create a stat block for a manifestation of them that fits the specific situation better. Mammon could for example be represented as a dragon hoarding gold.

Quote from Solarsyphon >>

In the typical dnd setting like faerun. Yeah, give arch fiends a stat a block but  if your view of angels and demons  are as unfathomable biblical monstrosities representing abstract concepts like greed or lust then probably don't, instead create a stat block for a manifestation of them that fits the specific situation better. Mammon could for example be represented as a dragon hoarding gold.

 Mammon isn't an abstract concept in D&D, though, he's an actual being.

I disagree that he needs to have a statblock, though, because statblocks are a thing that's only needed for something that the party is intended to be able to fight.  The Lords of the Nine are devils of godlike power that should be well beyond the capabilities of mortals to face in actual combat.