I then proceeded to look more closely at when it says this under Bestial Fury;
"When you command your beast to take the Beast's Strike action, the beast can use it twice."
This seems to have been overlooked, but it is different than a creature's multiattack which says that, as an action, it can attack twice. This, instead, says that WHENEVER you command it to take the Beast's Strike action, it can use it twice, which explicitly overrides the action economy, and there is no other if. Thus, with this feature, you CAN command it multiple times in a turn, unlike pre-level 11 when you could command it all you wanted, but nothing said it got multiple actions, post-level 11 it DOES get extra actions, as explicitly stated in the feature.
There is a problem with monster stat blocks in that it lists any attacks a creature can make under the heading of "Actions". And that mixing of "actions" and "attacks" makes for a problem, especially when mixed with features that are meant to allow the creature to make more than one attack as most of them would, under a strict RAW reading, include the creature using multiple actions.
I agree with @TarodNet and @Plaguescarred on how the Beast Master is intended to work.
I come to the same conclusion as TarodNet if a Ranger Beast Master spends enought ressource, the beast can attack twice;
You can take Bonus Action to command the beast to take the Beast's Strike action.
You can also sacrifice one of your attacks when you take the Attack action to command the beast to take the Beast's Strike action.
None of your bullet points address the fact that the beast only has one action. It doesn't gain another action because you command it.
I agree that the wording could be better or they could have clarified the number of attacks your beast can do. But just because the rules say at one point "you have only one action and you need an action to attack" doesn't mean that there are not a lot of exceptions to this. From action surge to haste spells to battle masters commanding the rogue to attack again. I don't think it's that unreasonable that a level 11 ranger can sacrifice an attack and a bonus action to allow his beast to attack 4 times. It's cool and powerful but not really overpowered because at that level he probably does about the same damage with his one attack as the beast with 2 attacks. And it does prevent him from using his bonus action for something else.
As for why he can't have his beast dodge and attack on earlier levels: I figure that would be a balancing issue.
If we sacrifice an attack, it performs the Beast’s Strike action in addition to Dodge. This doesn’t interact with Exceptional Training at all.
We can also spend a Bonus Action to have it take another Beast’s Strike action, which replaces that Dodge action. At level 7, Exceptional Training means you get pick one of the relevant actions for its (otherwise unused) Bonus Action.
At level 11, any time it takes the Beast’s Strike action, it gets two attacks (regardless of whether from attack sacrifice or Bonus Action).
In terms of Nick, it comes down to timing. You need to sacrifice one of your attacks when you declare the Attack action. At this point, Light cannot have possibly triggered (much less Nick shifting the attack). If you only have one attack, you have to sacrifice your only attack. If you have two or more attacks, you can reduce the normal number of attacks by one and then proceed to attack as normal.
As for balance, our level 11 Ranger can potentially attack 6 times per round - Light and Nick, attack sacrifice for two Bestial Strike, Bonus Action for two Bestial Strike. This is equivalent to a same level Monk (presuming the Monk takes the Weapon Mastery feat). However, the Monk is making all of their attacks based on the same stat (Dexterity) while our Ranger needs both Dex and Wis. The Monk is hitting for 5.5 + Dex damage per attack (33 + 6 Dex average). The Ranger is hitting for 3.5 + Dex twice and then 6.5 + Wis four times (33 + 2 Dex + 4 Wis average). This is also a comparison between a Ranger’s abilities including sub-class vs. a Monk’s abilities before considering sub-class.
If you're arguing that the "Beast gets one and only one action no matter how many commands you issue", then the sub-class is woefully underpowered.
The reason I'm saying it can attack whenever you command it starting at level 11 is that, at level 3, it says that you command it, and obviously it has to resolve that with its own action economy. On the other hand, at level 11, it says that it can attack twice WHEN YOU COMMAND IT TO, which overrides the action economy because it's not saying that, as an action, it can attack twice, but instead that, WHEN YOU COMMAND IT TO, it gets to attack twice, regardless of action econom
Basically, the level 11 feature says, "when A happens, B happens", so why would B not happen if A happens? Nothing in that phrase says anything about any other limitation, and I don't see why another limitation would apply.
I know action economy limits it to one action, but this DOES override that simply because it says that it "When you command it . . . it makes two attacks" because why would anything else be true?
Basically, the level 11 feature says, "when A happens, B happens", so why would B not happen if A happens? Nothing in that phrase says anything about any other limitation, and I don't see why another limitation would apply.
I know action economy limits it to one action, but this DOES override that simply because it says that it "When you command it . . . it makes two attacks" because why would anything else be true?
This argument seems to be based on a bad faith reading of the rules. I'm saying that using your bonus action to command the beast and using one of your attacks to command the beast does not give the beast 2 actions to do your commands because it does not say that it gives the beast another action. The feature you quoted only says when it takes the beast strike action it does so twice just like extra attack for PCs which is pretty clearly the intent. The argument that others have made is that commanding the beast gives it another action so that the beast can make 4 attacks at level 11 when commanded using a bonus action and forgoing an attack. But they have significant incongruence in their logic. They claim the beast can't dodge on its own, be commanded to attack with your attack, be commanded to attack with your bonus action, and be commanded to dash as a bonus action with the bonus action command. If commanding the beast gives it another action why can't it take the action that it's capable of doing on its own as well?
If we sacrifice an attack, it performs the Beast’s Strike action in addition to Dodge. This doesn’t interact with Exceptional Training at all.
We can also spend a Bonus Action to have it take another Beast’s Strike action, which replaces that Dodge action. At level 7, Exceptional Training means you get pick one of the relevant actions for its (otherwise unused) Bonus Action.
At level 11, any time it takes the Beast’s Strike action, it gets two attacks (regardless of whether from attack sacrifice or Bonus Action).
In terms of Nick, it comes down to timing. You need to sacrifice one of your attacks when you declare the Attack action. At this point, Light cannot have possibly triggered (much less Nick shifting the attack). If you only have one attack, you have to sacrifice your only attack. If you have two or more attacks, you can reduce the normal number of attacks by one and then proceed to attack as normal.
As for balance, our level 11 Ranger can potentially attack 6 times per round - Light and Nick, attack sacrifice for two Bestial Strike, Bonus Action for two Bestial Strike. This is equivalent to a same level Monk (presuming the Monk takes the Weapon Mastery feat). However, the Monk is making all of their attacks based on the same stat (Dexterity) while our Ranger needs both Dex and Wis. The Monk is hitting for 5.5 + Dex damage per attack (33 + 6 Dex average). The Ranger is hitting for 3.5 + Dex twice and then 6.5 + Wis four times (33 + 2 Dex + 4 Wis average). This is also a comparison between a Ranger’s abilities including sub-class vs. a Monk’s abilities before considering sub-class.
If you're arguing that the "Beast gets one and only one action no matter how many commands you issue", then the sub-class is woefully underpowered.
Your damage calculation is off. Based on the interpretation that commanding the beast gives it another action then the beast can dodge and dash or disengage while making 4 attacks at level 11. A monk can attack twice, or 3 times with Nick mastery, at level 11 and to get a Dodge and disengage it has to use its bonus action to use patient defense. That's the best comparison and using your bonus action for patient defense means you aren't using it for flurry of blows. You also included dex mod for the nick attack without explaining why you would add it. You can't really get fighting style feat that lets you add it as a straight class monk. A monk spending a focus point on patient defense and attacking 3 times (once without dex mod) is weaker than the beast making 4 attacks, dodging and disengaging and the monk has to use resources to do it. When you factor in lack of dex mod on one attack, the ranger and beast do comparable damage to a monk using flurry of blows and forgoing patient defense. The monk still has to use resources where the ranger doesn't and the beast is also dodging and disengaging or dashing.
There are alot of differing opinions with differing arguments for either interpretation of the rule. I think there is 1 key way of interpretation that everyone is missing. The Ranger and the Beast are joined. They are 2 parts of 1 team. The beast isn't a new player character, it is an extention of the Ranger. "The Beast only gets 1 attack" or "The beast gets 2 attacks" are completely ignoring the Ranger's involvement in the count. You can think of the Beast as a weapon and/or a spell in the Ranger's arsenal.
The Ranger can attack twice, once with an attack action weapon and again with a bonus action spell.
The Ranger can attack twice, once with an attack action weapon and again with the bonus action command to the beast.
The Ranger can attack once with an attack action command and forgo a 2nd attack to do domething different with their Bonus Action.
The Ranger can attack twice, once with an attack action command to the beast and again with the bonus action command to the beast.
The action economy doesn't change, only the what part of the team that acts changes.
And to address the Level buffs:
At Level 5, The Ranger gets an additional attack that can't be used to command the beast.
At Level 7, The Ranger gets an additional bonus action that can only be used to give the beast very limited additional actions.
At Level 11, The Ranger gets a maximum of 2 extra attacks, but they can only be used to command the beast to attack.
There is a problem with monster stat blocks in that it lists any attacks a creature can make under the heading of "Actions". And that mixing of "actions" and "attacks" makes for a problem, especially when mixed with features that are meant to allow the creature to make more than one attack as most of them would, under a strict RAW reading, include the creature using multiple actions.
I agree with @TarodNet and @Plaguescarred on how the Beast Master is intended to work.
I agree that the wording could be better or they could have clarified the number of attacks your beast can do. But just because the rules say at one point "you have only one action and you need an action to attack" doesn't mean that there are not a lot of exceptions to this. From action surge to haste spells to battle masters commanding the rogue to attack again. I don't think it's that unreasonable that a level 11 ranger can sacrifice an attack and a bonus action to allow his beast to attack 4 times. It's cool and powerful but not really overpowered because at that level he probably does about the same damage with his one attack as the beast with 2 attacks. And it does prevent him from using his bonus action for something else.
As for why he can't have his beast dodge and attack on earlier levels: I figure that would be a balancing issue.
My interpretation:
We start with the Beast taking the Dodge action.
If we sacrifice an attack, it performs the Beast’s Strike action in addition to Dodge. This doesn’t interact with Exceptional Training at all.
We can also spend a Bonus Action to have it take another Beast’s Strike action, which replaces that Dodge action. At level 7, Exceptional Training means you get pick one of the relevant actions for its (otherwise unused) Bonus Action.
At level 11, any time it takes the Beast’s Strike action, it gets two attacks (regardless of whether from attack sacrifice or Bonus Action).
In terms of Nick, it comes down to timing. You need to sacrifice one of your attacks when you declare the Attack action. At this point, Light cannot have possibly triggered (much less Nick shifting the attack). If you only have one attack, you have to sacrifice your only attack. If you have two or more attacks, you can reduce the normal number of attacks by one and then proceed to attack as normal.
As for balance, our level 11 Ranger can potentially attack 6 times per round - Light and Nick, attack sacrifice for two Bestial Strike, Bonus Action for two Bestial Strike. This is equivalent to a same level Monk (presuming the Monk takes the Weapon Mastery feat). However, the Monk is making all of their attacks based on the same stat (Dexterity) while our Ranger needs both Dex and Wis. The Monk is hitting for 5.5 + Dex damage per attack (33 + 6 Dex average). The Ranger is hitting for 3.5 + Dex twice and then 6.5 + Wis four times (33 + 2 Dex + 4 Wis average). This is also a comparison between a Ranger’s abilities including sub-class vs. a Monk’s abilities before considering sub-class.
If you're arguing that the "Beast gets one and only one action no matter how many commands you issue", then the sub-class is woefully underpowered.
The reason I'm saying it can attack whenever you command it starting at level 11 is that, at level 3, it says that you command it, and obviously it has to resolve that with its own action economy. On the other hand, at level 11, it says that it can attack twice WHEN YOU COMMAND IT TO, which overrides the action economy because it's not saying that, as an action, it can attack twice, but instead that, WHEN YOU COMMAND IT TO, it gets to attack twice, regardless of action econom
Basically, the level 11 feature says, "when A happens, B happens", so why would B not happen if A happens? Nothing in that phrase says anything about any other limitation, and I don't see why another limitation would apply.
I know action economy limits it to one action, but this DOES override that simply because it says that it "When you command it . . . it makes two attacks" because why would anything else be true?
This argument seems to be based on a bad faith reading of the rules. I'm saying that using your bonus action to command the beast and using one of your attacks to command the beast does not give the beast 2 actions to do your commands because it does not say that it gives the beast another action. The feature you quoted only says when it takes the beast strike action it does so twice just like extra attack for PCs which is pretty clearly the intent. The argument that others have made is that commanding the beast gives it another action so that the beast can make 4 attacks at level 11 when commanded using a bonus action and forgoing an attack. But they have significant incongruence in their logic. They claim the beast can't dodge on its own, be commanded to attack with your attack, be commanded to attack with your bonus action, and be commanded to dash as a bonus action with the bonus action command. If commanding the beast gives it another action why can't it take the action that it's capable of doing on its own as well?
Your damage calculation is off. Based on the interpretation that commanding the beast gives it another action then the beast can dodge and dash or disengage while making 4 attacks at level 11. A monk can attack twice, or 3 times with Nick mastery, at level 11 and to get a Dodge and disengage it has to use its bonus action to use patient defense. That's the best comparison and using your bonus action for patient defense means you aren't using it for flurry of blows. You also included dex mod for the nick attack without explaining why you would add it. You can't really get fighting style feat that lets you add it as a straight class monk. A monk spending a focus point on patient defense and attacking 3 times (once without dex mod) is weaker than the beast making 4 attacks, dodging and disengaging and the monk has to use resources to do it. When you factor in lack of dex mod on one attack, the ranger and beast do comparable damage to a monk using flurry of blows and forgoing patient defense. The monk still has to use resources where the ranger doesn't and the beast is also dodging and disengaging or dashing.
There are alot of differing opinions with differing arguments for either interpretation of the rule. I think there is 1 key way of interpretation that everyone is missing. The Ranger and the Beast are joined. They are 2 parts of 1 team. The beast isn't a new player character, it is an extention of the Ranger. "The Beast only gets 1 attack" or "The beast gets 2 attacks" are completely ignoring the Ranger's involvement in the count. You can think of the Beast as a weapon and/or a spell in the Ranger's arsenal.
The Ranger can attack twice, once with an attack action weapon and again with a bonus action spell.
The Ranger can attack twice, once with an attack action weapon and again with the bonus action command to the beast.
The Ranger can attack once with an attack action command and forgo a 2nd attack to do domething different with their Bonus Action.
The Ranger can attack twice, once with an attack action command to the beast and again with the bonus action command to the beast.
The action economy doesn't change, only the what part of the team that acts changes.
And to address the Level buffs:
At Level 5, The Ranger gets an additional attack that can't be used to command the beast.
At Level 7, The Ranger gets an additional bonus action that can only be used to give the beast very limited additional actions.
At Level 11, The Ranger gets a maximum of 2 extra attacks, but they can only be used to command the beast to attack.