Since there’s no longer an open section at the end of surveys for input, this is what we have to do now I guess. This new paladin is a better Ranger than every Ranger. And if the game is really backwards, compatible the new purple Dragon knight is just the drake warden Once again, taking away from Ranger. Not everyone wants an animal companion If a player wants an animal companion, the DM could just give them a sidekick,
I think the lack of ability to provide commentary on each feature is a huge gap in their current feedback system. The color-coding is nice to give them a high-level view of player's feelings about a class or feature, but even for things I rank Green I might have slight suggestions or commentary. For things that are red, I might have other suggestions.
So what ends up happening is I only rate features green if I think they're fine as is, and basically everything else is yellow, and red would only be for if I think something is just unusable and I have no thoughts which is rarely going to be the case. I can't imagine I'm the only one that feels this way, and for that reason I feel like their color-coded results aren't as accurate as they could be, because people want to leave comments.
Even if they don't read every single individual entry, I would find it hard to believe they don't have the tools to aggregate and summarize the feedback across the forms.
Since there’s no longer an open section at the end of surveys for input, this is what we have to do now I guess. This new paladin is a better Ranger than every Ranger. And if the game is really backwards, compatible the new purple Dragon knight is just the drake warden Once again, taking away from Ranger. Not everyone wants an animal companion If a player wants an animal companion, the DM could just give them a sidekick,
I think the lack of ability to provide commentary on each feature is a huge gap in their current feedback system. The color-coding is nice to give them a high-level view of player's feelings about a class or feature, but even for things I rank Green I might have slight suggestions or commentary. For things that are red, I might have other suggestions.
So what ends up happening is I only rate features green if I think they're fine as is, and basically everything else is yellow, and red would only be for if I think something is just unusable and I have no thoughts which is rarely going to be the case. I can't imagine I'm the only one that feels this way, and for that reason I feel like their color-coded results aren't as accurate as they could be, because people want to leave comments.
Even if they don't read every single individual entry, I would find it hard to believe they don't have the tools to aggregate and summarize the feedback across the forms.
Red means scrape the feature, they don’t want our ideas for a replacement feature.