Fire Absorption. Whenever the golem is subjected to fire damage, it takes no damage and instead regains a number of hit points equal to the fire damage dealt.
Immutable Form. The golem is immune to any spell or effect that would alter its form.
Magic Resistance. The golem has advantage on saving throws against spells and other magical effects.
Magic Weapons. The golem's weapon attacks are magical.
Multiattack. The golem makes two melee attacks.
Slam. Melee Weapon Attack: +13 to hit, reach 5 ft., one target. Hit: 20 (3d8 + 7) bludgeoning damage.
Sword. Melee Weapon Attack: +13 to hit, reach 10 ft., one target. Hit: 23 (3d10 + 7) slashing damage.
Poison Breath (Recharge 6). The golem exhales poisonous gas in a 15-foot cone. Each creature in that area must make a DC 19 Constitution saving throw, taking 45 (10d8) poison damage on a failed save, or half as much damage on a successful one.
This guy could kill a red dragon by it's lonesome
Why does this kind of golem not go berserk when damaged?
Most golems in D&D don't go berserk, the only 2 that do (at least I think only 2 go berserk if not counting variants) do those because they are references. Flesh Golems going berserk is a reference to Frankenstein's Monster and Clay Golems going berserk is a reference to Golem of Prague.
pretty sure its a consturct
Iron Golems have a higher challenge rating than Young Red Dragons
Most things have a CR higher than Young Dragons. Ancient Dragons, on the other hand, could kill this with ease.
Does Disintegrate count as an effect which would alter its form? We ruled no, because pretty much any form of damage could be flavoured as form-altering (eg being dented by a warhammer).
its so strong
Dragons don't do magical damage so they'd be 100% relying on bites and breath weapon. Not impossible but not something I'd say would be done 'with ease'.
Can someone explain to me why, outside of being nice to the players, a DM would ever use the slam attack? Why would I attack with 3d8 when I can attack with 3d10? I don't understand why the multiattack isn't written as, "The golem makes one attack with Slam and one attack with Sword." That would make sense, like it's giving you the old right-left. But as it's written, there's zero reason for me to ever use the slam attack.
Maybe if the slam attack caused a STR save to avoid being knocked prone, it could be viable. If it successfully knocked an enemy prone, its next attack would have advantage on the prone creature.
Yeah, or that. Another cool alternative. So many of the attack sets in the official stat block make zero sense.
I think that it would just have the same effects of Adamantine Armor.
Question: What would happen if a rust monster attacked an iron golem?
If you were a changeling or new disguise self could you disguise yourself as its creator in order to fool it or would it not be susceptible to that
Would the Iron Golem be affected by a Rust Monster?
So me and my friend created a iron golem and I have no regrets. This thing is a beast in battle
an ancient red dragon would lose to this thing...hard
This thing would make the perfect Red Dragon slayer.
Immunity to the dragon's bite, claws, and tail, and heals from its breath.
Assuming of course, the dragon has no clever tactics, innate magic abilities, or magic items (or minions that are equipped with magic items)
If it gets disarmed or you as a DM decide it attacks that way.
Your call, it is a spell effect technically so I think rules as written it gets advantage, but I might rule otherwise as a DM.