I like going through lists for various reasons (looking up Monsters, Spells, etc) but by doing this I've found myself many times in the position where I wished I could exclude some specific things in those lists from my search.
Some examples:
Some time ago I was looking through the Monster list, looking for Beasts with a CR from 0 - 1 who could Walk, or Fly so I could plan ahead in which Beasts my Land Druid could wildshape into. Sadly the list will then also show me Beasts like Dolphin or Quipper who have a walking speed of 0. :/ (note: my Druid will wildshape into swimming beasts, it just wasn't what I was looking for)
Just now I was browsing the Feats page, thinking I wished I could exclude all the race specific Feats except X.
Now, I don't know how possible this even would be, so see this more like a "This would be nice" instead of a "I need this!" =)
Your aren't wrong. Improving the search and filters was one of the first feedbacks I have.
Particularly, monsters and spells could use more filter options (like features, min/max movement, spell duration, etc). And Boolean qualifiers AND, OR, and NOT. And the search engine could use all sorts of additional tune ups (it should at least strive to meet pre-2004 google levels of quality).
I like going through lists for various reasons (looking up Monsters, Spells, etc) but by doing this I've found myself many times in the position where I wished I could exclude some specific things in those lists from my search.
Some examples:
Some time ago I was looking through the Monster list, looking for Beasts with a CR from 0 - 1 who could Walk, or Fly so I could plan ahead in which Beasts my Land Druid could wildshape into. Sadly the list will then also show me Beasts like Dolphin or Quipper who have a walking speed of 0. :/ (note: my Druid will wildshape into swimming beasts, it just wasn't what I was looking for)
Just now I was browsing the Feats page, thinking I wished I could exclude all the race specific Feats except X.
Now, I don't know how possible this even would be, so see this more like a "This would be nice" instead of a "I need this!" =)
Your aren't wrong. Improving the search and filters was one of the first feedbacks I have.
Particularly, monsters and spells could use more filter options (like features, min/max movement, spell duration, etc). And Boolean qualifiers AND, OR, and NOT. And the search engine could use all sorts of additional tune ups (it should at least strive to meet pre-2004 google levels of quality).
Agreeing on this - would like to send lists of potential animals to new Druids - and i can't exclude flying creatures that can also walk. :-/
+1
This still needs to be done.
I bought all the Sourcebooks and adventures on DDB, and now I can't find what I need because the search feature returns too many results.