Amorphous. The pudding can move through a space as narrow as 1 inch wide without squeezing.
Corrosive Form. A creature that touches the pudding or hits it with a melee attack while within 5 feet of it takes 4 (1d8) acid damage. Any nonmagical weapon made of metal or wood that hits the pudding corrodes. After dealing damage, the weapon takes a permanent and cumulative −1 penalty to damage rolls. If its penalty drops to −5, the weapon is destroyed.
Nonmagical ammunition made of metal or wood that hits the pudding is destroyed after dealing damage.
The pudding can eat through 2-inch-thick, nonmagical wood or metal in 1 round.
Spider Climb. The pudding can climb difficult surfaces, including upside down on ceilings, without needing to make an ability check.
Pseudopod. Melee Weapon Attack: +5 to hit, reach 5 ft., one target. Hit: 6 (1d6 + 3) bludgeoning damage plus 18 (4d8) acid damage. In addition, nonmagical armor worn by the target is partly dissolved and takes a permanent and cumulative −1 penalty to the AC it offers. The armor is destroyed if the penalty reduces its AC to 10.
Split. When a pudding that is Medium or larger is subjected to lightning or slashing damage, it splits into two new puddings if it has at least 10 hit points. Each new pudding has hit points equal to half the original pudding's, rounded down. New puddings are one size smaller than the original pudding.
Can a Black Pudding take Psychic damage? 0.o
I think so. (I don’t see why not.)
This is the monster from "Creepshow 2". Watch it if you don't believe me.
I recently killed one with vicious mockery ( a half-pudding, but still :D)
hot
After an encounter with this, all of the players I was DMing for always have baking soda with them.
Definitely the best cherry on the trap cake of a Mind Flayer lair... Buuuut speaking of Mind Flayers...
I like the Stranger Things Season 3 black pudding a lot more than 5E's.
aren't creatures ith low INT unaffected by psychic damage?
No intelligence whatsoever, but yeah, other minds can affect them
I love that.. I was just curious so I googled when it was invented, in the 1800s. As a DM how do you rationalize "technology" that wouldn't have been invented yet?
In my current game, my character accidentally made a tiny Black Pudding. It is contained in a jar and gets fed regularly. Is there any way/lore about them that they be made into an ally, pet, or at least friendly being?
Unless the character is Juiblex, then the answer would be no. A Black Pudding, as described here, is basically a mindless eating machine. It may not always be hungry, but when it is it will feast on anything. Even the person feeding it.
Why?
Was playing in a campaign where one of these hit the teams Tortle Monk with a natural 20. He's... uhhh... not around any more
I don't think so. Usually the monsters my guild fights needs to have some sort of intelligence to take damage from psychic magic
This may seem like a stupid question but is this an actual pudding that has gained sentience or just a slime? I’m imagining some demon priest enchanting a bowl of pudding to attack someone.
I love that. I'm probably gonna have some preist do that now. but it is a slime technically.
Question: when exactly is armor destroyed, when the base AC equals 10 or when the PC's AC equals 10? As in, do you take any potential DEX modifiers into account?
I think the corrosive form trait is a little overpowered. It basically says "Don't kill this thing with melee of you'll die." I've never used one, but I would definitely not use corrosive form if I did make my players fight one.
It’s alkaline and therefore neutralizes acid?