Amorphous. The pudding can move through a space as narrow as 1 inch wide without squeezing.
Corrosive Form. A creature that touches the pudding or hits it with a melee attack while within 5 feet of it takes 4 (1d8) acid damage. Any nonmagical weapon made of metal or wood that hits the pudding corrodes. After dealing damage, the weapon takes a permanent and cumulative −1 penalty to damage rolls. If its penalty drops to −5, the weapon is destroyed.
Nonmagical ammunition made of metal or wood that hits the pudding is destroyed after dealing damage.
The pudding can eat through 2-inch-thick, nonmagical wood or metal in 1 round.
Spider Climb. The pudding can climb difficult surfaces, including upside down on ceilings, without needing to make an ability check.
Pseudopod. Melee Weapon Attack: +5 to hit, reach 5 ft., one target. Hit: 6 (1d6 + 3) bludgeoning damage plus 18 (4d8) acid damage. In addition, nonmagical armor worn by the target is partly dissolved and takes a permanent and cumulative −1 penalty to the AC it offers. The armor is destroyed if the penalty reduces its AC to 10.
Split. When a pudding that is Medium or larger is subjected to lightning or slashing damage, it splits into two new puddings if it has at least 10 hit points. Each new pudding has hit points equal to half the original pudding's, rounded down. New puddings are one size smaller than the original pudding.
The illustration shows, and the description talks about, the Black Pudding engulfing its victim, like a Gelatinous Cube, but unlike the cube, there is no Engulf attack in the pudding's stat block. Was this just an oversight? I've got an encounter with one coming up, and as DM I'm thinking of borrowing the Gelatinous Cube's Engulf attack. Not sure yet if I'd use Engulf "as is" or modify it a bit.
English breakfast just got a lot more terrifying.
First thing I thought when I saw the picture used! "Don't tip the raft don't to the raft"
[Checks statblock for anything against fire damage first, happily spots none]
What happens if you fry it and serve it alongside bacon, tomatos, eggs and toast?
Because baking soda neutralizes acid
Do you double the acid damage on a crit? I feel like a CR4 monster shouldn't be able to do potentially 8d8 + 2d6 + 3 damage but also its rad af to crit with acid
Yes it can.
big brain
No, puddings are a colony of microbes. As they don't have a "mind" to damage they can't take psychic damage.
No, it has an intelligence of 1, meaning it's mindless.
Yes, it can take psychic damage. Psychic damage is not listed in its immunities or resistances.
Where did you learn this? It makes sense, but I just want to know.
As a DM, I usually have a pseudopod grapple a limb or multiple limbs in an effort to envelop a PC (similar to the pic), doing acid damage along the way. I think of it as a creature of mindless hunger, devouring everything it can. I would not allow psychic damage.
The real question here: Does it taste good? The answer is probably no. Also the name is a joke on real black pudding, which is a sausage thing. Well, actually, maybe it does taste good.
Considering they don't have brains or any form of thought, I'd say no.
i think this would be better as a trap tbh
*rolls d20*
*nat 20*
IT IS DELICIOUS!!!!!
best answer ive seen all day
Yes. If it couldn't, psychic damage would be explicitly listed as a damage immunity, which is not the case. Its intelligence score has no bearing on this unless something explicitly states otherwise, which nothing here does.