I wonder if this is all a misunderstanding about what different posters mean about "casting a spell with a spell casting focus". I'm going to try an analogy. Consider the statement: "I am golfing with my new golf bag." I am golfing, and I am using my new golf bag to carry my clubs, so the statement is true. But I cannot play golf using my golf bag to hit the ball, as that is against the rules of golf, so the statement is false.
So the statement "I am casting a spell no material components with my spell casting focus" is true in the first sense, but false in the second. Problems arise when one tries to elide the two, use the truth of the statement in the first sense to gain benefits that accrue if it were true in the second. If no such effort is made, there is no problem.
So @Brian_Avery, fill your boots. Cast your spells with your artisan tools, even when there are no material components required, so long as you still respect all the rules of casting spells with no material components, including having your other hand free to perform the somatic components. But you enjoy no mechanical benefit for doing so; the spell cast with your artisan tools in hand would be identical in all ways to the same spell cast without your artisan tools in hand.
But I would add that you don't need any feat or class feature to do it, any spell caster can cast spells "with artisan tools", or "with my new golf bag", or "with a big smile on my face" so long as all the RAW requirements of casting the spell are met.
I never once disagreed with any of the rules you mention.
I have a free hand to cast the spells that require S.
I also have another hand to hold the focus.
What I am saying is that the general rule is not applied if it is being used to gainsay a specific rule.
It works the other way around. The specific rule gainsays the general.
The regular rules for how a focus can be used when you have this feat don't apply. Continuing to argue they do and repeat them over and over doesn't change the rules.
My specific examples of being able to use the focus to cast a spell without M is a specific thing that can be accomplished the way I've explained using the rules as written.
So I can quote the rules and prove how what I am proposing is legitimate and legal according to RAW.
What everyone else keeps doing is illegal under RAW. You cannot have the general, regular way the rules work cover up or deny a specific rule. That goes against RAW.
It is always specific beats general, not the specific beats general except if it means a focus can be used to cast a spell without M. Then we will keep arguing that the general still applies.
It's like people arguing 2+2=5 no matter how many times you teach them math and let them work it out just to see them trying to fit a square peg into a round hole and somehow still get 5.
The correct answer will always be 4.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"A rightful place awaits you in the Realms Above, in the Land of the Great Light. Come in peace, and live beneath the sun again, where trees and flowers grow."
— The message of Eilistraee to all decent drow.
"Run thy sword across my chains, Silver Lady, that I may join your dance.”
I agree with most of what you say. One key exception is that the feat I mentioned allows me to cast a spell with a focus that doesn't have M because it says just that.
I am not twisting or changing anything to gainsay some weird advantage. The bullet point supports what I'm saying.
So in your analogy imagine if there was a rule that said you can indeed use your golf bag to hit the ball as they simply forgot to include a rule that said you couldn't do that. Maybe they figured no one would attempt such a thing so they simply didn't bother to include that rule.
I am not speaking to intentions or common sense. I am simply referring to the rule they quoted in the 3rd bullet point.
And again, this is not about circumventing any existing rule or trying to get around the requirements that the spell lists for it's components. I will still do the V (so long as I am not under a silence spell or anything.) and speak the vocal part of the spell. I will still perform the S and so the somatic components with a free hand. I will also use my other hand (yes, I have 2 hands) to hold my focus and use it to cast the spell as that is what the feat allows me to do by RAW. It is unnecessary to do so because the spell doesn't require any M component to cast. But I can still use the focus to cast any spell that uses INT as its spellcasting ability.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"A rightful place awaits you in the Realms Above, in the Land of the Great Light. Come in peace, and live beneath the sun again, where trees and flowers grow."
— The message of Eilistraee to all decent drow.
"Run thy sword across my chains, Silver Lady, that I may join your dance.”
I don’t think you know what specific beats general means. It means that exceptions exist, not that you replace rules with more specific ones.
Generally the component rules and focus rules work a particular way (hint: it is the way that everyone else has said that they work). An exception exits for Artificers that says that all of their spells require M components. All of the rules are still in place for Artificer, with the added exception provided by Tools Required.
No exception is required for the Artificer Initiate feat’s wording, so none exists. A specific rule only provides exceptions to the existing rules where they are in conflict. The Artificer Initiate feat is entirely consistent with other focus and component rules working the way that they do: S and no M = free hand required.
And again, this is not about circumventing any existing rule or trying to get around the requirements that the spell lists for it's components. I will still do the V (so long as I am not under a silence spell or anything.) and speak the vocal part of the spell. I will still perform the S and so the somatic components with a free hand. I will also use my other hand (yes, I have 2 hands) to hold my focus and use it to cast the spell as that is what the feat allows me to do by RAW. It is unnecessary to do so because the spell doesn't require any M component to cast. But I can still use the focus to cast any spell that uses INT as its spellcasting ability.
Unless you are somehow claiming that using Artisan Tools gives you some sort of in-game advantage that you would not otherwise enjoy, which it seems you are not, then their use makes no difference. And to quote a famous philosopher, "A difference that makes no difference is no difference at all."
Yes. I agree with having a free hand available to cast a spell that requires S. I have a free hand available to cast spells requiring S and will continue to use it to cast spell that require S. I will also continue to use my other hand to hold the focus and use it to cast the same spells that don't require any M.
The 3rd bullet point of the feat says I can do that.
And while you say exceptions exist, not that you replace rules with more specific ones. That is actually exactly what specific beats general means. You do replace and/or ignore the general ones in favor of the specific ones.
That is literally the whole point of specific beats general. That you do use the specific over the general.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"A rightful place awaits you in the Realms Above, in the Land of the Great Light. Come in peace, and live beneath the sun again, where trees and flowers grow."
— The message of Eilistraee to all decent drow.
"Run thy sword across my chains, Silver Lady, that I may join your dance.”
That is literally the whole point of specific beats general. That you do use the specific over the general.
Where the exception is in conflict with the rest of the general rule. You don't just go making wholesale changes to rules when no exception is made, which is what you're doing here.
That is to say, it is not a specific beats general situation when the specific and general rule do not conflict. No text in the feat conflicts with how these related rules work.
......The Artificer Initiate feat is entirely consistent with other focus and component rules working the way that they do: S and no M = free hand required.
According to TCoE, page 11:
"You can cast prepared artificer spells using INT as your spellcasting modifier and prepared artificer spells as rituals if they have the ritual tag. You must have a spellcasting focus — specifically thieves’ tools or some kind of artisan’s tool — in hand when you cast any spell with this feature."
So, artificers need spell-casting focus for all the spells, and if a spell requires somatic component (S), the same hand that's used to hold spell-casting focus can be used for performing somatic action.
From PHB:
"A spellcaster must have a hand free to access a spell’s material components — or to hold a spellcasting focus — but it can be the same hand that he or she uses to perform somatic components."
The 3rd bullet point of the feat says I can use artisan tools as a spellcasting focus to cast any spell that uses INT as its spellcasting focus.
This means I can use the artisan tools to cast a spell that doesn't have M in its component requirements.
This goes against what you can normally do. Although I don't see anywhere where it says you can do this or you cannot do this. I'm just taking it for granted that you normally can't do this. The feat I mentioned does allow me to do this.
That is a specific exception to what is normally allowed. If people normally don't allow a focus to be used to cast a spell that doesn't have M so isn't really necessary.
And by using the RAW to do what the 3rd bullet point allows me to do makes a big difference. I can now have a 5th level artificer/alchemist who multi classes into a 2nd level wizard/scribe, and with the Artificer Initiate feat I can cast Magic Missile using my Alchemist's Supplies and add my INT bonus to the damage roll.
This makes some chunky darts!!!
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"A rightful place awaits you in the Realms Above, in the Land of the Great Light. Come in peace, and live beneath the sun again, where trees and flowers grow."
— The message of Eilistraee to all decent drow.
"Run thy sword across my chains, Silver Lady, that I may join your dance.”
The regular rules for how a focus can be used when you have this feat don't apply. Continuing to argue they do and repeat them over and over doesn't change the rules.
My specific examples of being able to use the focus to cast a spell without M is a specific thing that can be accomplished the way I've explained using the rules as written.
So I can quote the rules and prove how what I am proposing is legitimate and legal according to RAW.
Are opposite cases.
The problem is that your "specific examples of being able to cast a spell without M" does not let you cast spells without M with it.
It specifically allows you to use the tool as a spellcasting focus for INT spells that normal spellcasting focus rules apply to. It uses the exact same language as every spellcasting class that can use a focus for their spells and works the exact same way.
If it is a specific exception, it is the 10th one (after every spellcasting class and blood hunter) and makes the general rule only specific to race spells and third casters.
Also, your "quoting of the rules" hasn't even been the single complete sentence, just 3 snippets out of context. But we already know it uses the same common language every spellcasting play has read a thousand times since it was first printed in the PHB (or did basic rules come first?), so it hasn't been confusing us.
You produce your artificer spell effects through your tools. You must have a spellcasting focus—specifically thieves’ tools or some kind of artisan’s tool—in hand when you cast any spell with this Spellcasting feature (meaning the spell has an ‘M’ component when you cast it). You must be proficient with the tool to use it in this way. See chapter 5, “Equipment,” in the Player’s Handbook for descriptions of these tools.
After you gain the Infuse Item feature at 2nd level, you can also use any item bearing one of your infusions as a spellcasting focus.
From the Feat:
Artificer Initiate
...
You gain proficiency with one type of artisan’s tools of your choice, and you can use that type of tool as a spellcasting focus for any spell you cast that uses Intelligence as its spellcasting ability.
Artifice Initiate allows tools to work like other focuses, not like tools required. It does not add M to any spell that doesn't have it. Where are you reading that it does?
......The Artificer Initiate feat is entirely consistent with other focus and component rules working the way that they do: S and no M = free hand required.
According to TCoE, page 11:
"You can cast prepared artificer spells using INT as your spellcasting modifier and prepared artificer spells as rituals if they have the ritual tag. You must have a spellcasting focus — specifically thieves’ tools or some kind of artisan’s tool — in hand when you cast any spell with this feature."
So, artificers need spell-casting focus for all the spells, and if a spell requires somatic component (S), the same hand that's used to hold spell-casting focus can be used for performing somatic action.
From PHB:
"A spellcaster must have a hand free to access a spell’s material components — or to hold a spellcasting focus — but it can be the same hand that he or she uses to perform somatic components."
You seem to have gotten confused.
The artificer class is not involved in the argument, and the feat in question does not have that requirement nor reference it at all.
The argument has only been about whether a spellcasting focus can be used to cast a spell with no required material component at all.
The 3rd bullet point of the feat says I can use artisan tools as a spellcasting focus to cast any spell that uses INT as its spellcasting focus.
This means I can use the artisan tools to cast a spell that doesn't have M in its component requirements.
Put everything about specific and general aside. This right here is what we have been repeatedly telling you is what you got wrong. There is no specific that contradicts general.
You can use the tools as a focus, but nothing specifically indicates it doesn't follow normal material component rules.
Every spellcasting class has a variation of this exact sentence. The only differences are what is used as a focus and what spells can use that focus.
The 3rd bullet point of the feat says I can use artisan tools as a spellcasting focus to cast any spell that uses INT as its spellcasting focus.
This means I can use the artisan tools to cast a spell that doesn't have M in its component requirements.
This goes against what you can normally do. Although I don't see anywhere where it says you can do this or you cannot do this. I'm just taking it for granted that you normally can't do this. The feat I mentioned does allow me to do this.
That is a specific exception to what is normally allowed. If people normally don't allow a focus to be used to cast a spell that doesn't have M so isn't really necessary.
And by using the RAW to do what the 3rd bullet point allows me to do makes a big difference. I can now have a 5th level artificer/alchemist who multi classes into a 2nd level wizard/scribe, and with the Artificer Initiate feat I can cast Magic Missile using my Alchemist's Supplies and add my INT bonus to the damage roll.
This makes some chunky darts!!!
Good luck convincing your DM. You've not convinced me, nor seemingly anyone else.
...Artificer Initiate allows tools to work like other focuses, not like tools required. It does not add M to any spell that doesn't have it. Where are you reading that it does?
I'm talking about the 'spellcasting' rule for 'artificer' class, please read my post again for clarification.
...Artificer Initiate allows tools to work like other focuses, not like tools required. It does not add M to any spell that doesn't have it. Where are you reading that it does?
I'm talking about the 'spellcasting' rule for 'artificer' class, please read my post again for clarification.
And I laid that out in a previous post to. I thin DxJxC was right. You seem to be talking about something different than the rest of the thread.
The artificer class is not involved in the argument, and the feat in question does not have that requirement nor reference it at all.
The argument has only been about whether a spellcasting focus can be used to cast a spell with no required material component at all.
The feat 'artificer initiate' is involved and the rules are derived from 'artificer' class features.
And no, it would be redundant to use a spellcasting focus for casting spell that doesn't have material component, but Artificers have exceptional rule.
......The Artificer Initiate feat is entirely consistent with other focus and component rules working the way that they do: S and no M = free hand required.
According to TCoE, page 11:
"You can cast prepared artificer spells using INT as your spellcasting modifier and prepared artificer spells as rituals if they have the ritual tag. You must have a spellcasting focus — specifically thieves’ tools or some kind of artisan’s tool — in hand when you cast any spell with this feature."
So, artificers need spell-casting focus for all the spells, and if a spell requires somatic component (S), the same hand that's used to hold spell-casting focus can be used for performing somatic action.
From PHB:
"A spellcaster must have a hand free to access a spell’s material components — or to hold a spellcasting focus — but it can be the same hand that he or she uses to perform somatic components."
Another example: a cleric’s holy symbol is emblazoned on her shield. She likes to wade into melee combat with a mace in one hand and a shield in the other. She uses the holy symbol as her spellcasting focus, so she needs to have the shield in hand when she casts a cleric spell that has a material component. If the spell, such as aid, also has a somatic component, she can perform that component with the shield hand and keep holding the mace in the other.
If the same cleric casts cure wounds, she needs to put the mace or the shield away, because that spell doesn’t have a material component but does have a somatic component. She’s going to need a free hand to make the spell’s gestures. If she had the War Caster feat, she could ignore this restriction.
The artificer class is not involved in the argument, and the feat in question does not have that requirement nor reference it at all.
The argument has only been about whether a spellcasting focus can be used to cast a spell with no required material component at all.
The feat 'artificer initiate' is involved and the rules are derived from 'artificer' class features.
And no, it would be redundant to use a spellcasting focus for casting spell that doesn't have material component, but Artificers have exceptional rule.
No, the Artificer Initiate has its own unique text. It does not rely on Tools Required at all. There is no reference to it or shared language regarding M components.
No, the Artificer Initiate has its own unique text. It does not rely on Tools Required at all. There is no reference to it or shared language regarding M components.
I wonder if this is all a misunderstanding about what different posters mean about "casting a spell with a spell casting focus". I'm going to try an analogy. Consider the statement: "I am golfing with my new golf bag." I am golfing, and I am using my new golf bag to carry my clubs, so the statement is true. But I cannot play golf using my golf bag to hit the ball, as that is against the rules of golf, so the statement is false.
So the statement "I am casting a spell no material components with my spell casting focus" is true in the first sense, but false in the second. Problems arise when one tries to elide the two, use the truth of the statement in the first sense to gain benefits that accrue if it were true in the second. If no such effort is made, there is no problem.
So @Brian_Avery, fill your boots. Cast your spells with your artisan tools, even when there are no material components required, so long as you still respect all the rules of casting spells with no material components, including having your other hand free to perform the somatic components. But you enjoy no mechanical benefit for doing so; the spell cast with your artisan tools in hand would be identical in all ways to the same spell cast without your artisan tools in hand.
But I would add that you don't need any feat or class feature to do it, any spell caster can cast spells "with artisan tools", or "with my new golf bag", or "with a big smile on my face" so long as all the RAW requirements of casting the spell are met.
I never once disagreed with any of the rules you mention.
I have a free hand to cast the spells that require S.
I also have another hand to hold the focus.
What I am saying is that the general rule is not applied if it is being used to gainsay a specific rule.
It works the other way around. The specific rule gainsays the general.
The regular rules for how a focus can be used when you have this feat don't apply. Continuing to argue they do and repeat them over and over doesn't change the rules.
My specific examples of being able to use the focus to cast a spell without M is a specific thing that can be accomplished the way I've explained using the rules as written.
So I can quote the rules and prove how what I am proposing is legitimate and legal according to RAW.
What everyone else keeps doing is illegal under RAW. You cannot have the general, regular way the rules work cover up or deny a specific rule. That goes against RAW.
It is always specific beats general, not the specific beats general except if it means a focus can be used to cast a spell without M. Then we will keep arguing that the general still applies.
It's like people arguing 2+2=5 no matter how many times you teach them math and let them work it out just to see them trying to fit a square peg into a round hole and somehow still get 5.
The correct answer will always be 4.
MiddleAgedNoob
I agree with most of what you say. One key exception is that the feat I mentioned allows me to cast a spell with a focus that doesn't have M because it says just that.
I am not twisting or changing anything to gainsay some weird advantage. The bullet point supports what I'm saying.
So in your analogy imagine if there was a rule that said you can indeed use your golf bag to hit the ball as they simply forgot to include a rule that said you couldn't do that. Maybe they figured no one would attempt such a thing so they simply didn't bother to include that rule.
I am not speaking to intentions or common sense. I am simply referring to the rule they quoted in the 3rd bullet point.
And again, this is not about circumventing any existing rule or trying to get around the requirements that the spell lists for it's components. I will still do the V (so long as I am not under a silence spell or anything.) and speak the vocal part of the spell. I will still perform the S and so the somatic components with a free hand. I will also use my other hand (yes, I have 2 hands) to hold my focus and use it to cast the spell as that is what the feat allows me to do by RAW. It is unnecessary to do so because the spell doesn't require any M component to cast. But I can still use the focus to cast any spell that uses INT as its spellcasting ability.
I don’t think you know what specific beats general means. It means that exceptions exist, not that you replace rules with more specific ones.
Generally the component rules and focus rules work a particular way (hint: it is the way that everyone else has said that they work). An exception exits for Artificers that says that all of their spells require M components. All of the rules are still in place for Artificer, with the added exception provided by Tools Required.
No exception is required for the Artificer Initiate feat’s wording, so none exists. A specific rule only provides exceptions to the existing rules where they are in conflict. The Artificer Initiate feat is entirely consistent with other focus and component rules working the way that they do: S and no M = free hand required.
Unless you are somehow claiming that using Artisan Tools gives you some sort of in-game advantage that you would not otherwise enjoy, which it seems you are not, then their use makes no difference. And to quote a famous philosopher, "A difference that makes no difference is no difference at all."
WolfOfTheBees
Yes. I agree with having a free hand available to cast a spell that requires S. I have a free hand available to cast spells requiring S and will continue to use it to cast spell that require S. I will also continue to use my other hand to hold the focus and use it to cast the same spells that don't require any M.
The 3rd bullet point of the feat says I can do that.
And while you say exceptions exist, not that you replace rules with more specific ones. That is actually exactly what specific beats general means. You do replace and/or ignore the general ones in favor of the specific ones.
That is literally the whole point of specific beats general. That you do use the specific over the general.
Where the exception is in conflict with the rest of the general rule. You don't just go making wholesale changes to rules when no exception is made, which is what you're doing here.
That is to say, it is not a specific beats general situation when the specific and general rule do not conflict. No text in the feat conflicts with how these related rules work.
According to TCoE, page 11:
InkedBee (Undead_Analyst)
Covetous, Dragonish Thoughts - Jenviel Tsumara: Fallen Aasimar- Monk|Crimson Sands of Time - Navarra Iltazyara: Human- Druid/Warlock| Bleak Prospect - Ermasnietsz: Reborn- Clockwork Soul Sorcerer
The 3rd bullet point of the feat says I can use artisan tools as a spellcasting focus to cast any spell that uses INT as its spellcasting focus.
This means I can use the artisan tools to cast a spell that doesn't have M in its component requirements.
This goes against what you can normally do. Although I don't see anywhere where it says you can do this or you cannot do this. I'm just taking it for granted that you normally can't do this. The feat I mentioned does allow me to do this.
That is a specific exception to what is normally allowed. If people normally don't allow a focus to be used to cast a spell that doesn't have M so isn't really necessary.
And by using the RAW to do what the 3rd bullet point allows me to do makes a big difference. I can now have a 5th level artificer/alchemist who multi classes into a 2nd level wizard/scribe, and with the Artificer Initiate feat I can cast Magic Missile using my Alchemist's Supplies and add my INT bonus to the damage roll.
This makes some chunky darts!!!
I feel like I'm being gaslit, because this:
And this:
Are opposite cases.
The problem is that your "specific examples of being able to cast a spell without M" does not let you cast spells without M with it.
It specifically allows you to use the tool as a spellcasting focus for INT spells that normal spellcasting focus rules apply to. It uses the exact same language as every spellcasting class that can use a focus for their spells and works the exact same way.
If it is a specific exception, it is the 10th one (after every spellcasting class and blood hunter) and makes the general rule only specific to race spells and third casters.
Also, your "quoting of the rules" hasn't even been the single complete sentence, just 3 snippets out of context. But we already know it uses the same common language every spellcasting play has read a thousand times since it was first printed in the PHB (or did basic rules come first?), so it hasn't been confusing us.
No, Brian_Avery.
From the wizard:
Spellcasting Focus
You can use an arcane focus (see the Adventuring Gear section) as a spellcasting focus for your wizard spells.
From the artificer:DxJxC
Tools Required
You produce your artificer spell effects through your tools. You must have a spellcasting focus—specifically thieves’ tools or some kind of artisan’s tool—in hand when you cast any spell with this Spellcasting feature (meaning the spell has an ‘M’ component when you cast it). You must be proficient with the tool to use it in this way. See chapter 5, “Equipment,” in the Player’s Handbook for descriptions of these tools.
After you gain the Infuse Item feature at 2nd level, you can also use any item bearing one of your infusions as a spellcasting focus.
From the Feat:
Artificer Initiate
...
Artifice Initiate allows tools to work like other focuses, not like tools required. It does not add M to any spell that doesn't have it. Where are you reading that it does?
You seem to have gotten confused.
The artificer class is not involved in the argument, and the feat in question does not have that requirement nor reference it at all.
The argument has only been about whether a spellcasting focus can be used to cast a spell with no required material component at all.
Put everything about specific and general aside. This right here is what we have been repeatedly telling you is what you got wrong. There is no specific that contradicts general.
You can use the tools as a focus, but nothing specifically indicates it doesn't follow normal material component rules.
Every spellcasting class has a variation of this exact sentence. The only differences are what is used as a focus and what spells can use that focus.
Good luck convincing your DM. You've not convinced me, nor seemingly anyone else.
I'm talking about the 'spellcasting' rule for 'artificer' class, please read my post again for clarification.
InkedBee (Undead_Analyst)
Covetous, Dragonish Thoughts - Jenviel Tsumara: Fallen Aasimar- Monk|Crimson Sands of Time - Navarra Iltazyara: Human- Druid/Warlock| Bleak Prospect - Ermasnietsz: Reborn- Clockwork Soul Sorcerer
And I laid that out in a previous post to. I thin DxJxC was right. You seem to be talking about something different than the rest of the thread.
The feat 'artificer initiate' is involved and the rules are derived from 'artificer' class features.
And no, it would be redundant to use a spellcasting focus for casting spell that doesn't have material component, but Artificers have exceptional rule.
InkedBee (Undead_Analyst)
Covetous, Dragonish Thoughts - Jenviel Tsumara: Fallen Aasimar- Monk|Crimson Sands of Time - Navarra Iltazyara: Human- Druid/Warlock| Bleak Prospect - Ermasnietsz: Reborn- Clockwork Soul Sorcerer
The Sage Advice Compendium, which is RAW, clearly states that you cannot use a hand holding a spell casting focus to perform somatic components for spells that do not have material components. https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/sac/sage-advice-compendium#SA165
Another example: a cleric’s holy symbol is emblazoned on her shield. She likes to wade into melee combat with a mace in one hand and a shield in the other. She uses the holy symbol as her spellcasting focus, so she needs to have the shield in hand when she casts a cleric spell that has a material component. If the spell, such as aid, also has a somatic component, she can perform that component with the shield hand and keep holding the mace in the other.
If the same cleric casts cure wounds, she needs to put the mace or the shield away, because that spell doesn’t have a material component but does have a somatic component. She’s going to need a free hand to make the spell’s gestures. If she had the War Caster feat, she could ignore this restriction.
No, the Artificer Initiate has its own unique text. It does not rely on Tools Required at all. There is no reference to it or shared language regarding M components.
Agreed, my previous posts support the concept.
InkedBee (Undead_Analyst)
Covetous, Dragonish Thoughts - Jenviel Tsumara: Fallen Aasimar- Monk|Crimson Sands of Time - Navarra Iltazyara: Human- Druid/Warlock| Bleak Prospect - Ermasnietsz: Reborn- Clockwork Soul Sorcerer