Planescape is more... Spelljammer and Planescape will be nodded at. They will have refrences. But they're not very 5E beyond refrences, they're not "core" enough. I reckon we'll see Dragonlance or Greyhawk, and honestly I'd prefer the latter.
I really dig the Planescape concept…I think it has the greatest potential for a mind-blowing sort of sourcebook / adventure.
Or become WBtW level of childishness... I'm not anti-Planescape (I am anti-Spelljammer as more than just references, because it's just so clown bonkers it's off-putting), just more Idea Spooked.
Actually, Greyhawk could be really cool. Be grittier than any 5E release, even maybe Eberron.
I will debate Planescape and Dark Sun. Dark Sun is a very maybe, given the Psionics rules backlash on all 5e versions (Mystic = hated, Tasha's = hated, UA = hated), it's unlikely that it will come around, especially giving the popularity of Eberron which does Dark Sun more universally friendly and the racism inherent in the original setting.
Nonetheless, I still think there is a high chance Dark Sun is one of the ones.
They could just reprint the psionics options from Tasha's. Yes, they're controversial, but they also are what we got, and WotC doesn't seem inclined to give us more (if they do, it will probably be something aligned with how Eberron treated Dragonmarks or how Strixhaven is treating its college features as feats).
(I'll also argue against the "racism inherent in the original setting" statement. The slavery is justified by the cruelty of the world, and 4e's Dark Sun book walked back the ****-origin of the Mul. Dark Sun can definitely be done in a non-problematic way, and according to Wizards of the Coast's own surveys, Dark Sun is one of the two most popular settings that hasn't been translated to D&D 5e yet. The other was Planescape.)
Planescape is more... Spelljammer and Planescape will be nodded at. They will have refrences. But they're not very 5E beyond refrences, they're not "core" enough.
Spelljammer has been nodded at (Rime of the Frostmaiden with the Nautiloid, Dungeon of the Mad Mage with the Squid Ship, Spelljamming Helm, and Asteroid Dungeon, Mordenkainen's with the Giff, Volo's with the Neogi and reference to Mind Flayers travelling to other worlds). I agree that it's not popular or "core" enough to get a 5e book anytime soon, but Planescape is an entirely different matter.
Planescape is one of the most popular settings in D&D's history. It's technically already a part of D&D 5e, it's right in the DMG's section describing the Planes of Existence. Descent into Avernus shows how they could translate the other planes to D&D 5e in a modern way. WotC has published a ton of Planescape material since the 3 Core Rulebooks (Maruts, Steel Predators, and fiends in Mordenkainen's, Hollyphants in Descent into Avernus, etc).
Planescape is popular enough to get translated to D&D 5e. Especially with the new D&D Magic: the Gathering set and Jeremy Crawford's Vi character being canonically a planeswalker from Eberron that lives in Sigil. IMO, Planescape and Dark Sun are the most likely D&D settings to be translated to D&D 5e in the near future now that Ravenloft, Eberron, and Exandria all have D&D 5e books. (Ignoring M:tG settings and that entirely new setting the WotC team is working on.)
I reckon we'll see Dragonlance or Greyhawk, and honestly I'd prefer the latter.
Greyhawk isn't distinct enough from the Forgotten Realms (or Exandria) to get its own setting book. It doesn't have enough of a following, especially without Mike Mearls at the head of the D&D team now (he was a huge fan of Greyhawk, but was involved in a scandal and was fired, so it's less likely for Greyhawk to come now than it was when he was working there, and since we didn't get Greyhawk when he was basically in charge of D&D, I'm fairly inclined to believe that we won't be getting it now).
Dragonlance is more problematic than most of the other classic D&D settings (representation of women and Native Americans, its extremely religious roots, its ableist portrayals of Gully Dwarves and, too an extent, Tinker Gnomes, etc), and if WotC made a Dragonlance book, it wouldn't be popular enough amongst younger fans that it would probably be a flop. It also doesn't have much new to it that D&D 5e doesn't already have from Forgotten Realms and Exandria. (Also, the fact that Fizban's is about to come out also makes me think that a Dragonlance book would be too similar in theme, especially with the book referencing both Dragonlance and Council of Wyrms.)
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
I will debate Planescape and Dark Sun. Dark Sun is a very maybe, given the Psionics rules backlash on all 5e versions (Mystic = hated, Tasha's = hated, UA = hated), it's unlikely that it will come around, especially giving the popularity of Eberron which does Dark Sun more universally friendly and the racism inherent in the original setting.
Nonetheless, I still think there is a high chance Dark Sun is one of the ones.
They could just reprint the psionics options from Tasha's. Yes, they're controversial, but they also are what we got, and WotC doesn't seem inclined to give us more (if they do, it will probably be something aligned with how Eberron treated Dragonmarks or how Strixhaven is treating its college features as feats).
(I'll also argue against the "racism inherent in the original setting" statement. The slavery is justified by the cruelty of the world, and 4e's Dark Sun book walked back the ****-origin of the Mul. Dark Sun can definitely be done in a non-problematic way, and according to Wizards of the Coast's own surveys, Dark Sun is one of the two most popular settings that hasn't been translated to D&D 5e yet. The other was Planescape.)
Planescape is more... Spelljammer and Planescape will be nodded at. They will have refrences. But they're not very 5E beyond refrences, they're not "core" enough.
Spelljammer has been nodded at (Rime of the Frostmaiden with the Nautiloid, Dungeon of the Mad Mage with the Squid Ship, Spelljamming Helm, and Asteroid Dungeon, Mordenkainen's with the Giff, Volo's with the Neogi and reference to Mind Flayers travelling to other worlds). I agree that it's not popular or "core" enough to get a 5e book anytime soon, but Planescape is an entirely different matter.
Planescape is one of the most popular settings in D&D's history. It's technically already a part of D&D 5e, it's right in the DMG's section describing the Planes of Existence. Descent into Avernus shows how they could translate the other planes to D&D 5e in a modern way. WotC has published a ton of Planescape material since the 3 Core Rulebooks (Maruts, Steel Predators, and fiends in Mordenkainen's, Hollyphants in Descent into Avernus, etc).
Planescape is popular enough to get translated to D&D 5e. Especially with the new D&D Magic: the Gathering set and Jeremy Crawford's Vi character being canonically a planeswalker from Eberron that lives in Sigil. IMO, Planescape and Dark Sun are the most likely D&D settings to be translated to D&D 5e in the near future now that Ravenloft, Eberron, and Exandria all have D&D 5e books. (Ignoring M:tG settings and that entirely new setting the WotC team is working on.)
I reckon we'll see Dragonlance or Greyhawk, and honestly I'd prefer the latter.
Greyhawk isn't distinct enough from the Forgotten Realms (or Exandria) to get its own setting book. It doesn't have enough of a following, especially without Mike Mearls at the head of the D&D team now (he was a huge fan of Greyhawk, but was involved in a scandal and was fired, so it's less likely for Greyhawk to come now than it was when he was working there, and since we didn't get Greyhawk when he was basically in charge of D&D, I'm fairly inclined to believe that we won't be getting it now).
Dragonlance is more problematic than most of the other classic D&D settings (representation of women and Native Americans, its extremely religious roots, its ableist portrayals of Gully Dwarves and, too an extent, Tinker Gnomes, etc), and if WotC made a Dragonlance book, it wouldn't be popular enough amongst younger fans that it would probably be a flop. It also doesn't have much new to it that D&D 5e doesn't already have from Forgotten Realms and Exandria. (Also, the fact that Fizban's is about to come out also makes me think that a Dragonlance book would be too similar in theme, especially with the book referencing both Dragonlance and Council of Wyrms.)
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Planescape is more... Spelljammer and Planescape will be nodded at. They will have refrences. But they're not very 5E beyond refrences, they're not "core" enough. I reckon we'll see Dragonlance or Greyhawk, and honestly I'd prefer the latter.
I really dig the Planescape concept…I think it has the greatest potential for a mind-blowing sort of sourcebook / adventure.
(I am anti-Spelljammer as more than just references, because it's just so clown bonkers it's off-putting)
I will fight you on that! Spelljammer is so ridiculous that it's amazing! Penguin-People riding atop Flying Pigs, Spider-Eels mind control humanoids, Scro (which are just "Orcs" backwards) as a subspecies of Orcs that are Lawful Evil, and Hippo-Headed, Gunslinging British-Humanoids are my jam! (pun intended)
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Planescape is more... Spelljammer and Planescape will be nodded at. They will have refrences. But they're not very 5E beyond refrences, they're not "core" enough. I reckon we'll see Dragonlance or Greyhawk, and honestly I'd prefer the latter.
I really dig the Planescape concept…I think it has the greatest potential for a mind-blowing sort of sourcebook / adventure.
(I am anti-Spelljammer as more than just references, because it's just so clown bonkers it's off-putting)
I will fight you on that! Spelljammer is so ridiculous that it's amazing! Penguin-People riding atop Flying Pigs, Spider-Eels mind control humanoids, Scro (which are just "Orcs" backwards) as a subspecies of Orcs that are Lawful Evil, and Hippo-Headed, Gunslinging British-Humanoids are my jam! (pun intended)
There's a difference between comedy and bonkers. Comedy has measure.
Actually, you might be right about Planescape... Hmm. I don't know enough to be authoritative.
Planescape is more... Spelljammer and Planescape will be nodded at. They will have refrences. But they're not very 5E beyond refrences, they're not "core" enough. I reckon we'll see Dragonlance or Greyhawk, and honestly I'd prefer the latter.
I really dig the Planescape concept…I think it has the greatest potential for a mind-blowing sort of sourcebook / adventure.
(I am anti-Spelljammer as more than just references, because it's just so clown bonkers it's off-putting)
I will fight you on that! Spelljammer is so ridiculous that it's amazing! Penguin-People riding atop Flying Pigs, Spider-Eels mind control humanoids, Scro (which are just "Orcs" backwards) as a subspecies of Orcs that are Lawful Evil, and Hippo-Headed, Gunslinging British-Humanoids are my jam! (pun intended)
There's a difference between comedy and bonkers. Comedy has measure.
Nonsense! Have you not seen Monty Python and the Holy Grail? It's a bonkers comedy, and is perhaps the greatest comedy in human history!
Actually, you might be right about Planescape... Hmm. I don't know enough to be authoritative.
I probably only know a small amount more than you do, as I never played previous editions. However, it is a super popular setting, and would be fairly easy to translate to D&D 5e.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
I'm really going to regret saying this and potentially dumping gas on a fire, but nobody is complaining about fictional characters being racist. The complaint is twofold:
In many cases, it is all but confirmed that the racism is correct (such as by saying that one race is inherently inclined towards being good and another evil). There's a difference between a human in the Eberron setting assuming that because an orc is an orc that they must have innate violent tendencies and a human in the Forgotten Realms setting doing the same. The former is textually, objectively wrong, but in the case of the latter, they are not wrong to think that. Even if an individual orc is not evil, the text states they are imbued by their gods with a strong tendency in that direction.
In the case of certain races (again, orcs), the negative stereotype bears a disturbing resemblance to real world stereotypes about racial minorities (strong, unintelligent, violent, sexually aggressive). And before anyone tries to read that in bad faith and say "oh, so you're saying you think black people are orcs" as I've seen people responding to this do in the past, pointing out that a stereotype exists is not the same thing as holding that stereotype. The Star Wars prequels got flak for having Watto look like an Antisemitic caricature, and you don't need to actually be an Antisemite to see the connection.
None of this is to say that I am against racial stereotypes in fantasy. You shouldn't expect a nonhuman to exhibit human behavior, and my favorite examples of this are lizardfolk and tortles. I don't even think it is inherently racist to have some fantasy species exhibit behaviors that we'd consider to be antisocial. However, I do think there is valid criticism of some fantasy racial tropes that can't be dismissed as simply the snowflakes getting offended about everything.
Tl;dr, having a fictional character be racist is fine. Having the text say that their racist views are basically correct is not so much.
I'm really going to regret saying this and potentially dumping gas on a fire, but nobody is complaining about fictional characters being racist. The complaint is twofold:
In many cases, it is all but confirmed that the racism is correct (such as by saying that one race is inherently inclined towards being good and another evil). There's a difference between a human in the Eberron setting assuming that because an orc is an orc that they must have innate violent tendencies and a human in the Forgotten Realms setting doing the same. The former is textually, objectively wrong, but in the case of the latter, they are not wrong to think that. Even if an individual orc is not evil, the text states they are imbued by their gods with a strong tendency in that direction.
In the case of certain races (again, orcs), the negative stereotype bears a disturbing resemblance to real world stereotypes about racial minorities (strong, unintelligent, violent, sexually aggressive). And before anyone tries to read that in bad faith and say "oh, so you're saying you think black people are orcs" as I've seen people responding to this do in the past, pointing out that a stereotype exists is not the same thing as holding that stereotype. The Star Wars prequels got flak for having Watto look like an Antisemitic caricature, and you don't need to actually be an Antisemite to see the connection.
None of this is to say that I am against racial stereotypes in fantasy. You shouldn't expect a nonhuman to exhibit human behavior, and my favorite examples of this are lizardfolk and tortles. I don't even think it is inherently racist to have some fantasy species exhibit behaviors that we'd consider to be antisocial. However, I do think there is valid criticism of some fantasy racial tropes that can't be dismissed as simply the snowflakes getting offended about everything.
Tl;dr, having a fictional character be racist is fine. Having the text say that their racist views are basically correct is not so much.
I disagree on Lizardfolk and Tortles, but I agree on a lot of everything else you said. Curses drive you mad.
I will debate Planescape and Dark Sun. Dark Sun is a very maybe, given the Psionics rules backlash on all 5e versions (Mystic = hated, Tasha's = hated, UA = hated), it's unlikely that it will come around, especially giving the popularity of Eberron which does Dark Sun more universally friendly and the racism inherent in the original setting.
Nonetheless, I still think there is a high chance Dark Sun is one of the ones.
They could just reprint the psionics options from Tasha's. Yes, they're controversial, but they also are what we got, and WotC doesn't seem inclined to give us more (if they do, it will probably be something aligned with how Eberron treated Dragonmarks or how Strixhaven is treating its college features as feats).
(I'll also argue against the "racism inherent in the original setting" statement. The slavery is justified by the cruelty of the world, and 4e's Dark Sun book walked back the ****-origin of the Mul. Dark Sun can definitely be done in a non-problematic way, and according to Wizards of the Coast's own surveys, Dark Sun is one of the two most popular settings that hasn't been translated to D&D 5e yet. The other was Planescape.)
Planescape is more... Spelljammer and Planescape will be nodded at. They will have refrences. But they're not very 5E beyond refrences, they're not "core" enough.
Spelljammer has been nodded at (Rime of the Frostmaiden with the Nautiloid, Dungeon of the Mad Mage with the Squid Ship, Spelljamming Helm, and Asteroid Dungeon, Mordenkainen's with the Giff, Volo's with the Neogi and reference to Mind Flayers travelling to other worlds). I agree that it's not popular or "core" enough to get a 5e book anytime soon, but Planescape is an entirely different matter.
Planescape is one of the most popular settings in D&D's history. It's technically already a part of D&D 5e, it's right in the DMG's section describing the Planes of Existence. Descent into Avernus shows how they could translate the other planes to D&D 5e in a modern way. WotC has published a ton of Planescape material since the 3 Core Rulebooks (Maruts, Steel Predators, and fiends in Mordenkainen's, Hollyphants in Descent into Avernus, etc).
Planescape is popular enough to get translated to D&D 5e. Especially with the new D&D Magic: the Gathering set and Jeremy Crawford's Vi character being canonically a planeswalker from Eberron that lives in Sigil. IMO, Planescape and Dark Sun are the most likely D&D settings to be translated to D&D 5e in the near future now that Ravenloft, Eberron, and Exandria all have D&D 5e books. (Ignoring M:tG settings and that entirely new setting the WotC team is working on.)
I reckon we'll see Dragonlance or Greyhawk, and honestly I'd prefer the latter.
Greyhawk isn't distinct enough from the Forgotten Realms (or Exandria) to get its own setting book. It doesn't have enough of a following, especially without Mike Mearls at the head of the D&D team now (he was a huge fan of Greyhawk, but was involved in a scandal and was fired, so it's less likely for Greyhawk to come now than it was when he was working there, and since we didn't get Greyhawk when he was basically in charge of D&D, I'm fairly inclined to believe that we won't be getting it now).
Dragonlance is more problematic than most of the other classic D&D settings (representation of women and Native Americans, its extremely religious roots, its ableist portrayals of Gully Dwarves and, too an extent, Tinker Gnomes, etc), and if WotC made a Dragonlance book, it wouldn't be popular enough amongst younger fans that it would probably be a flop. It also doesn't have much new to it that D&D 5e doesn't already have from Forgotten Realms and Exandria. (Also, the fact that Fizban's is about to come out also makes me think that a Dragonlance book would be too similar in theme, especially with the book referencing both Dragonlance and Council of Wyrms.)
While I would dearly like to disagree with you about the Greyhawk part I have to agree, there is a small group of people (compared to the other settings) who still uses it, and I'm part of it as a DM. There have been fan made adaptations to 5th. Lovingly done and of surprisingly high quality. But the Greyhawk fans are still fighting the edition wars like there is no tomorrow. (Me personally I adapt to 5th what I can or just change it completely.) That said even that mixed group of 1st, 2nd, 3.5, 5th, OSR, whatever the Gygax last edition was called is minuscule. Greyhawk fans got living Greyhawk in 3.5 and that's going to be it for a while. And then we have not spoken yet about the controversial figure of Gygax himself or what one of his sons is doing with the new TSR thing. Yeah I wouldn't touch the IP with a ten foot pole.
I'm really going to regret saying this and potentially dumping gas on a fire, but nobody is complaining about fictional characters being racist. The complaint is twofold:
In many cases, it is all but confirmed that the racism is correct (such as by saying that one race is inherently inclined towards being good and another evil). There's a difference between a human in the Eberron setting assuming that because an orc is an orc that they must have innate violent tendencies and a human in the Forgotten Realms setting doing the same. The former is textually, objectively wrong, but in the case of the latter, they are not wrong to think that. Even if an individual orc is not evil, the text states they are imbued by their gods with a strong tendency in that direction.
In the case of certain races (again, orcs), the negative stereotype bears a disturbing resemblance to real world stereotypes about racial minorities (strong, unintelligent, violent, sexually aggressive). And before anyone tries to read that in bad faith and say "oh, so you're saying you think black people are orcs" as I've seen people responding to this do in the past, pointing out that a stereotype exists is not the same thing as holding that stereotype. The Star Wars prequels got flak for having Watto look like an Antisemitic caricature, and you don't need to actually be an Antisemite to see the connection.
None of this is to say that I am against racial stereotypes in fantasy. You shouldn't expect a nonhuman to exhibit human behavior, and my favorite examples of this are lizardfolk and tortles. I don't even think it is inherently racist to have some fantasy species exhibit behaviors that we'd consider to be antisocial. However, I do think there is valid criticism of some fantasy racial tropes that can't be dismissed as simply the snowflakes getting offended about everything.
Tl;dr, having a fictional character be racist is fine. Having the text say that their racist views are basically correct is not so much.
I'm not going to go over most of this, because it's been done hundreds of times now, and I agree with you on most of the points.
I, as an autistic person, love playing Lizardfolk. Not that I've actually ever played one, because I'm always the DM, but Lizardfolk are one of my favorite races because of their social quirks. To me, it's relatable, and I can understand how to roleplay someone that doesn't understand social cues or emotions because that's my life. The same applies to Gnomes and Warforged. I love these three races, they're my favorite races in the game, because they're so relatable to me. Roleplaying Gnomes brings out my hyper-fixations on things that I like (reading, D&D, music, video games, etc) and my ADHD side (where they're all frantic, disorganized, and twitchy), and Warforged help me tell stories about discovering your place in the world, being different from everyone else, and trying to be accepted by the world around you as a person, which are also incredibly relatable to me.
And this is the correct way to build races. Give them traits that people can relate to, give them a place and story in the world, and make them be important to some niche in your world. Don't make them caricatures, or 1 dimensional stereotypes, and definitely don't mock them or say that they're wrong for being the way they are. Embrace them and help the people that want to play them explore what it means to play that race. That's one of the major ways how you keep races from roleplaying exactly like humans do. When they embody negative tropes, that's when you get into the problematic area. Gnomes, Warforged, and Lizardfolk can embody specific aspects and personality traits similar to those that people with Autism, ADHD, or a vast swathe of different background experiences, and that's absolutely fine as long as it's done in the right way.
That's the difference between the concerns raised about Drow and Orcs and the traits that Gnomes, Warforged, Lizardfolk, (you said Tortles), and other races can embody.
I brought up Tortles because of their reproduction. They don't develop the urge to procreate until later in life, which WILL affect the developmental psychology of a species when that is the norm, and young tortles will usually have their parents die before they fully mature. This, for them, isn't a tragedy. It is normal, and if they never meet a human and live among humans, it is simply the natural order of things to not have parents when you reach adulthood.
So, this is more long term than related to the next Unearthed Arcana, but with the announcement of something big coming in 2024, any guesses on what that will be? I don't think it will be 6th Edition, as 5e is doing pretty good, and it has been promised to be backwards compatible.
Im expecting there to be alot of either variant/optional features for or reworks of certain classes/subclasses. Maybe making the way races work post-Tasha's a standard, idk. I dont expect them to change the core mechanics of how 5e works though, since they are suggesting it will backwards compatible
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Four-time Judge of the Competition of the Finest Brews! Come join us in making fun, unique homebrew and voting for your favorite entries!
5.5 with the errata, the ranger changes, Tashas character creation as part of the core or on the same lvl as feats, and some other small updates to what went wrong with 5th. Clarifications of rules that needed sage advice. And a general revamping or scrapping or the alignment system and cultural system like we are already seeing with Drow and Vistani. That would be my guess.
With the announcement of the new monster book, which will reprint alot of stuff with changes, I wonder if we will soon see UA for the new/changed races that they intend to include.
I havent counted, but they said the book will include 30 races. Is that just a collection of the races from other books compiled together or will they be introducing new ones?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Four-time Judge of the Competition of the Finest Brews! Come join us in making fun, unique homebrew and voting for your favorite entries!
With the announcement of the new monster book, which will reprint alot of stuff with changes, I wonder if we will soon see UA for the new/changed races that they intend to include.
I havent counted, but they said the book will include 30 races. Is that just a collection of the races from other books compiled together or will they be introducing new ones?
They said it was races from other books, but updated to be in line with Tasha's.
With the announcement of the new monster book, which will reprint alot of stuff with changes, I wonder if we will soon see UA for the new/changed races that they intend to include.
I havent counted, but they said the book will include 30 races. Is that just a collection of the races from other books compiled together or will they be introducing new ones?
They said it was races from other books, but updated to be in line with Tasha's.
Yes the races in the Mordenkanian's Multiverse will all be "updates" of previously playable races, and they were very emphatic on "setting agnostic" so I'm guessing all published races (maybe excluding PHB) except Eberon, Ravinica and Theros (and Acquisitions?)... I think if you tally them all up, to include elf sub races and maybe the tiefling variants, you'll get to 30 (and if you think about it a lot of those races appear in Volos or Mord's anyway and this book is basically a "revision" of those two books' bestiaries). Monsters will also be updates, no "new" content there.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Jander Sunstar is the thinking person's Drizzt, fight me.
We're in a weird world, where (for Strixhaven and the next book at least) books are being announced before relevant UA is.
Better than the other way, which would be releasing the books without UA because you don't want to spoil the book (like they did with Explorer's Guide to Wildemount).
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Or become WBtW level of childishness... I'm not anti-Planescape (I am anti-Spelljammer as more than just references, because it's just so clown bonkers it's off-putting), just more Idea Spooked.
Actually, Greyhawk could be really cool. Be grittier than any 5E release, even maybe Eberron.
Frequent Eladrin || They/Them, but accept all pronouns
Luz Noceda would like to remind you that you're worth loving!
They could just reprint the psionics options from Tasha's. Yes, they're controversial, but they also are what we got, and WotC doesn't seem inclined to give us more (if they do, it will probably be something aligned with how Eberron treated Dragonmarks or how Strixhaven is treating its college features as feats).
(I'll also argue against the "racism inherent in the original setting" statement. The slavery is justified by the cruelty of the world, and 4e's Dark Sun book walked back the ****-origin of the Mul. Dark Sun can definitely be done in a non-problematic way, and according to Wizards of the Coast's own surveys, Dark Sun is one of the two most popular settings that hasn't been translated to D&D 5e yet. The other was Planescape.)
Spelljammer has been nodded at (Rime of the Frostmaiden with the Nautiloid, Dungeon of the Mad Mage with the Squid Ship, Spelljamming Helm, and Asteroid Dungeon, Mordenkainen's with the Giff, Volo's with the Neogi and reference to Mind Flayers travelling to other worlds). I agree that it's not popular or "core" enough to get a 5e book anytime soon, but Planescape is an entirely different matter.
Planescape is one of the most popular settings in D&D's history. It's technically already a part of D&D 5e, it's right in the DMG's section describing the Planes of Existence. Descent into Avernus shows how they could translate the other planes to D&D 5e in a modern way. WotC has published a ton of Planescape material since the 3 Core Rulebooks (Maruts, Steel Predators, and fiends in Mordenkainen's, Hollyphants in Descent into Avernus, etc).
Planescape is popular enough to get translated to D&D 5e. Especially with the new D&D Magic: the Gathering set and Jeremy Crawford's Vi character being canonically a planeswalker from Eberron that lives in Sigil. IMO, Planescape and Dark Sun are the most likely D&D settings to be translated to D&D 5e in the near future now that Ravenloft, Eberron, and Exandria all have D&D 5e books. (Ignoring M:tG settings and that entirely new setting the WotC team is working on.)
Greyhawk isn't distinct enough from the Forgotten Realms (or Exandria) to get its own setting book. It doesn't have enough of a following, especially without Mike Mearls at the head of the D&D team now (he was a huge fan of Greyhawk, but was involved in a scandal and was fired, so it's less likely for Greyhawk to come now than it was when he was working there, and since we didn't get Greyhawk when he was basically in charge of D&D, I'm fairly inclined to believe that we won't be getting it now).
Dragonlance is more problematic than most of the other classic D&D settings (representation of women and Native Americans, its extremely religious roots, its ableist portrayals of Gully Dwarves and, too an extent, Tinker Gnomes, etc), and if WotC made a Dragonlance book, it wouldn't be popular enough amongst younger fans that it would probably be a flop. It also doesn't have much new to it that D&D 5e doesn't already have from Forgotten Realms and Exandria. (Also, the fact that Fizban's is about to come out also makes me think that a Dragonlance book would be too similar in theme, especially with the book referencing both Dragonlance and Council of Wyrms.)
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Spells, Monsters, Subclasses, Races, Arcknight Class, Occultist Class, World, Enigmatic Esoterica forms
They could just reprint the psionics options from Tasha's. Yes, they're controversial, but they also are what we got, and WotC doesn't seem inclined to give us more (if they do, it will probably be something aligned with how Eberron treated Dragonmarks or how Strixhaven is treating its college features as feats).
(I'll also argue against the "racism inherent in the original setting" statement. The slavery is justified by the cruelty of the world, and 4e's Dark Sun book walked back the ****-origin of the Mul. Dark Sun can definitely be done in a non-problematic way, and according to Wizards of the Coast's own surveys, Dark Sun is one of the two most popular settings that hasn't been translated to D&D 5e yet. The other was Planescape.)
Spelljammer has been nodded at (Rime of the Frostmaiden with the Nautiloid, Dungeon of the Mad Mage with the Squid Ship, Spelljamming Helm, and Asteroid Dungeon, Mordenkainen's with the Giff, Volo's with the Neogi and reference to Mind Flayers travelling to other worlds). I agree that it's not popular or "core" enough to get a 5e book anytime soon, but Planescape is an entirely different matter.
Planescape is one of the most popular settings in D&D's history. It's technically already a part of D&D 5e, it's right in the DMG's section describing the Planes of Existence. Descent into Avernus shows how they could translate the other planes to D&D 5e in a modern way. WotC has published a ton of Planescape material since the 3 Core Rulebooks (Maruts, Steel Predators, and fiends in Mordenkainen's, Hollyphants in Descent into Avernus, etc).
Planescape is popular enough to get translated to D&D 5e. Especially with the new D&D Magic: the Gathering set and Jeremy Crawford's Vi character being canonically a planeswalker from Eberron that lives in Sigil. IMO, Planescape and Dark Sun are the most likely D&D settings to be translated to D&D 5e in the near future now that Ravenloft, Eberron, and Exandria all have D&D 5e books. (Ignoring M:tG settings and that entirely new setting the WotC team is working on.)
Greyhawk isn't distinct enough from the Forgotten Realms (or Exandria) to get its own setting book. It doesn't have enough of a following, especially without Mike Mearls at the head of the D&D team now (he was a huge fan of Greyhawk, but was involved in a scandal and was fired, so it's less likely for Greyhawk to come now than it was when he was working there, and since we didn't get Greyhawk when he was basically in charge of D&D, I'm fairly inclined to believe that we won't be getting it now).
Dragonlance is more problematic than most of the other classic D&D settings (representation of women and Native Americans, its extremely religious roots, its ableist portrayals of Gully Dwarves and, too an extent, Tinker Gnomes, etc), and if WotC made a Dragonlance book, it wouldn't be popular enough amongst younger fans that it would probably be a flop. It also doesn't have much new to it that D&D 5e doesn't already have from Forgotten Realms and Exandria. (Also, the fact that Fizban's is about to come out also makes me think that a Dragonlance book would be too similar in theme, especially with the book referencing both Dragonlance and Council of Wyrms.)
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Spells, Monsters, Subclasses, Races, Arcknight Class, Occultist Class, World, Enigmatic Esoterica forms
I will fight you on that! Spelljammer is so ridiculous that it's amazing! Penguin-People riding atop Flying Pigs, Spider-Eels mind control humanoids, Scro (which are just "Orcs" backwards) as a subspecies of Orcs that are Lawful Evil, and Hippo-Headed, Gunslinging British-Humanoids are my jam! (pun intended)
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Spells, Monsters, Subclasses, Races, Arcknight Class, Occultist Class, World, Enigmatic Esoterica forms
There's a difference between comedy and bonkers. Comedy has measure.
Actually, you might be right about Planescape... Hmm. I don't know enough to be authoritative.
Frequent Eladrin || They/Them, but accept all pronouns
Luz Noceda would like to remind you that you're worth loving!
Nonsense! Have you not seen Monty Python and the Holy Grail? It's a bonkers comedy, and is perhaps the greatest comedy in human history!
I probably only know a small amount more than you do, as I never played previous editions. However, it is a super popular setting, and would be fairly easy to translate to D&D 5e.
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Spells, Monsters, Subclasses, Races, Arcknight Class, Occultist Class, World, Enigmatic Esoterica forms
I'm really going to regret saying this and potentially dumping gas on a fire, but nobody is complaining about fictional characters being racist. The complaint is twofold:
None of this is to say that I am against racial stereotypes in fantasy. You shouldn't expect a nonhuman to exhibit human behavior, and my favorite examples of this are lizardfolk and tortles. I don't even think it is inherently racist to have some fantasy species exhibit behaviors that we'd consider to be antisocial. However, I do think there is valid criticism of some fantasy racial tropes that can't be dismissed as simply the snowflakes getting offended about everything.
Tl;dr, having a fictional character be racist is fine. Having the text say that their racist views are basically correct is not so much.
I disagree on Lizardfolk and Tortles, but I agree on a lot of everything else you said. Curses drive you mad.
Frequent Eladrin || They/Them, but accept all pronouns
Luz Noceda would like to remind you that you're worth loving!
While I would dearly like to disagree with you about the Greyhawk part I have to agree, there is a small group of people (compared to the other settings) who still uses it, and I'm part of it as a DM. There have been fan made adaptations to 5th. Lovingly done and of surprisingly high quality. But the Greyhawk fans are still fighting the edition wars like there is no tomorrow. (Me personally I adapt to 5th what I can or just change it completely.) That said even that mixed group of 1st, 2nd, 3.5, 5th, OSR, whatever the Gygax last edition was called is minuscule. Greyhawk fans got living Greyhawk in 3.5 and that's going to be it for a while. And then we have not spoken yet about the controversial figure of Gygax himself or what one of his sons is doing with the new TSR thing. Yeah I wouldn't touch the IP with a ten foot pole.
I'm not going to go over most of this, because it's been done hundreds of times now, and I agree with you on most of the points.
I, as an autistic person, love playing Lizardfolk. Not that I've actually ever played one, because I'm always the DM, but Lizardfolk are one of my favorite races because of their social quirks. To me, it's relatable, and I can understand how to roleplay someone that doesn't understand social cues or emotions because that's my life. The same applies to Gnomes and Warforged. I love these three races, they're my favorite races in the game, because they're so relatable to me. Roleplaying Gnomes brings out my hyper-fixations on things that I like (reading, D&D, music, video games, etc) and my ADHD side (where they're all frantic, disorganized, and twitchy), and Warforged help me tell stories about discovering your place in the world, being different from everyone else, and trying to be accepted by the world around you as a person, which are also incredibly relatable to me.
And this is the correct way to build races. Give them traits that people can relate to, give them a place and story in the world, and make them be important to some niche in your world. Don't make them caricatures, or 1 dimensional stereotypes, and definitely don't mock them or say that they're wrong for being the way they are. Embrace them and help the people that want to play them explore what it means to play that race. That's one of the major ways how you keep races from roleplaying exactly like humans do. When they embody negative tropes, that's when you get into the problematic area. Gnomes, Warforged, and Lizardfolk can embody specific aspects and personality traits similar to those that people with Autism, ADHD, or a vast swathe of different background experiences, and that's absolutely fine as long as it's done in the right way.
That's the difference between the concerns raised about Drow and Orcs and the traits that Gnomes, Warforged, Lizardfolk, (you said Tortles), and other races can embody.
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Spells, Monsters, Subclasses, Races, Arcknight Class, Occultist Class, World, Enigmatic Esoterica forms
I brought up Tortles because of their reproduction. They don't develop the urge to procreate until later in life, which WILL affect the developmental psychology of a species when that is the norm, and young tortles will usually have their parents die before they fully mature. This, for them, isn't a tragedy. It is normal, and if they never meet a human and live among humans, it is simply the natural order of things to not have parents when you reach adulthood.
So, this is more long term than related to the next Unearthed Arcana, but with the announcement of something big coming in 2024, any guesses on what that will be? I don't think it will be 6th Edition, as 5e is doing pretty good, and it has been promised to be backwards compatible.
Im expecting there to be alot of either variant/optional features for or reworks of certain classes/subclasses. Maybe making the way races work post-Tasha's a standard, idk. I dont expect them to change the core mechanics of how 5e works though, since they are suggesting it will backwards compatible
Four-time Judge of the Competition of the Finest Brews! Come join us in making fun, unique homebrew and voting for your favorite entries!
5.5 with the errata, the ranger changes, Tashas character creation as part of the core or on the same lvl as feats, and some other small updates to what went wrong with 5th. Clarifications of rules that needed sage advice. And a general revamping or scrapping or the alignment system and cultural system like we are already seeing with Drow and Vistani. That would be my guess.
With the announcement of the new monster book, which will reprint alot of stuff with changes, I wonder if we will soon see UA for the new/changed races that they intend to include.
I havent counted, but they said the book will include 30 races. Is that just a collection of the races from other books compiled together or will they be introducing new ones?
Four-time Judge of the Competition of the Finest Brews! Come join us in making fun, unique homebrew and voting for your favorite entries!
They said it was races from other books, but updated to be in line with Tasha's.
She/Her Player and Dungeon Master
Yes the races in the Mordenkanian's Multiverse will all be "updates" of previously playable races, and they were very emphatic on "setting agnostic" so I'm guessing all published races (maybe excluding PHB) except Eberon, Ravinica and Theros (and Acquisitions?)... I think if you tally them all up, to include elf sub races and maybe the tiefling variants, you'll get to 30 (and if you think about it a lot of those races appear in Volos or Mord's anyway and this book is basically a "revision" of those two books' bestiaries). Monsters will also be updates, no "new" content there.
Jander Sunstar is the thinking person's Drizzt, fight me.
We may have already gotten the UA for Mordenkainen Presents Monsters of the Multiverse: the Kobold, and maybe even the Hobgoblin of the Feywild.
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Spells, Monsters, Subclasses, Races, Arcknight Class, Occultist Class, World, Enigmatic Esoterica forms
We're in a weird world, where (for Strixhaven and the next book at least) books are being announced before relevant UA is.
Frequent Eladrin || They/Them, but accept all pronouns
Luz Noceda would like to remind you that you're worth loving!
Better than the other way, which would be releasing the books without UA because you don't want to spoil the book (like they did with Explorer's Guide to Wildemount).
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Spells, Monsters, Subclasses, Races, Arcknight Class, Occultist Class, World, Enigmatic Esoterica forms