I don’t think there would he much overlap with the Rune Knight and Artificer, yes the Rune Knight can get advantage on Blacksmithing, but I’m talking about crafting giant themed weapons and armour - not short rest runes of each giant type
well its more that both rely heavily on intelegence, all rune knights have proficiency in smiths tools and their runes must be attached to their armor and weapons to be useful to them, sort of like infusions, as they gain levels they gain more runes and can infuse more runes, yeah it is not quite like infusions since they are not magic items and the fighter can grow like giant, but still
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
i am soup, with too many ideas (all of them very spicy) who has made sufficient homebrew material and character to last an thousand human lifetimes
A giant themed barbarian that can increase in size would be great. Ideally aimed towards unarmed/grappling for my tastes but different ordning could offer some variation in play style. There's a path of the jotunkin on the homebrew forum that looks pretty fun (with a little bit of down tuning)
I think we will start to see UA for things that will line up with the next MtG setting. We got Ravnica around the time of the Guilds of Ravnica/Ravnica Allegiance, then they announced the Theros book around the release of Theros: Beyond Death block. So it won't be Ikora, Zendikar or the expansion after that, but the next one there after I think.
You may have been joking, but it kind of lines up. In 18 months I really believe that you will see another MtG book that will match up with the MtG block.
You may have been joking, but it kind of lines up. In 18 months I really believe that you will see another MtG book that will match up with the MtG block.
Yeah, in 18 months. Us getting another M:tG setting right after Theros was the joke.
I think we will start to see UA for things that will line up with the next MtG setting. We got Ravnica around the time of the Guilds of Ravnica/Ravnica Allegiance, then they announced the Theros book around the release of Theros: Beyond Death block. So it won't be Ikora, Zendikar or the expansion after that, but the next one there after I think.
I think the next M:tG setting will be Innistrad, based on a tweet from Chris Perkins last year. He said that if you liked Curse of Strahd, you'd like a book they were working on for 2020. That makes me think of either Innistrad or Planescape, because Barovia is technically in the shadowfell. If they are working on Innistrad, I'd expect a fleshmancer artificer subclass to come out fairly soon.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
I'm hoping for Innistrad. Stichers, the Doctor Frankenstein-esque zombie artificers, would be a cool branching out for the Artificer class. (We need more artificer subclasses.) I think that they will do planescape, and probably before Innistrad, but I doubt that it is related to the Perkins tweet. Yes, Barovia is in the Shadowfell, but wasn't planescape more about the outer planes and Sigil? Also, if they gave us Innistrad, we might get official Eldrazi stat blocks. That would be great.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
A fool pulls the leaves. A brute chops the trunk. A sage digs the roots.
I'm hoping for Innistrad. Stichers, the Doctor Frankenstein-esque zombie artificers, would be a cool branching out for the Artificer class. (We need more artificer subclasses.) I think that they will do planescape, and probably before Innistrad, but I doubt that it is related to the Perkins tweet. Yes, Barovia is in the Shadowfell, but wasn't planescape more about the outer planes and Sigil? Also, if they gave us Innistrad, we might get official Eldrazi stat blocks. That would be great.
I would like stitchers/fleshmancers for an artificer. Would be cool. I don't think we'll get another M:tG setting in 2020, but maybe by the end of 2021. (We do need more Artificer subclasses. This is also why I want the Archivist back.)
Planescape is normally more about the outer planes and sigil, but the inner planes still are a large part of it. I don't think perkins was referencing planescape in that tweet, I'm still not sure what he was talking about, but I would like planescape before Innistrad as well, and I do think Planescape will come by the end of the year.
Eldrazi could be cool to bring to 5e, but I don't know how many players would understand what they are.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Thanks for clarifying. Eldrazi would be difficult to bring to 5e, but they could end up similar to the Daelkyr from Ebberon, as evil abberation overlords. Just weirder and more powerful.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
A fool pulls the leaves. A brute chops the trunk. A sage digs the roots.
Thanks for clarifying. Eldrazi would be difficult to bring to 5e, but they could end up similar to the Daelkyr from Ebberon, as evil abberation overlords. Just weirder and more powerful.
Definition of Aberration Overlords from any campaign setting: (My own definition)
"Any weirds otherworldly creature with multiple eyeballs, tentacles, arms, or other 'gross' parts of nature that has significant power."
Eldrazi, Daelkyr, Elder Evils, and other aberrations from any D&D settings are very similar in theme.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Thanks for clarifying. Eldrazi would be difficult to bring to 5e, but they could end up similar to the Daelkyr from Ebberon, as evil abberation overlords. Just weirder and more powerful.
If Theros has actual stat blocks and such for the Theros gods, giving stats and abilities to the Eldrazi titans' avatars should be easier. These are all creatures you fight in MTG, so I wouldn't be against it.
Thanks for clarifying. Eldrazi would be difficult to bring to 5e, but they could end up similar to the Daelkyr from Ebberon, as evil abberation overlords. Just weirder and more powerful.
If Theros has actual stat blocks and such for the Theros gods, giving stats and abilities to the Eldrazi titans' avatars should be easier. These are all creatures you fight in MTG, so I wouldn't be against it.
I doubt Theros will have god stats. There will be mythic creatures, but I think they'll be more champions of the gods and Nyx creatures. Eldrazi are probably around CR 30, or at least the very powerful ones. They could easily stat out some of the lower powered Eldrazi, and possibly some higher powered ones if they were to do an Innistrad book. If they do Innistrad or Zendikar, they'll have to do Eldrazi stats because they're major villains.
5e isn't big on statting out gods. We only have Tiamat, and she's in 2 adventures. Gods normally aren't antagonists in adventures, and you normally don't get to fight or slay them, so WotC normally doesn't stat them out.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Thanks for clarifying. Eldrazi would be difficult to bring to 5e, but they could end up similar to the Daelkyr from Ebberon, as evil abberation overlords. Just weirder and more powerful.
If Theros has actual stat blocks and such for the Theros gods, giving stats and abilities to the Eldrazi titans' avatars should be easier. These are all creatures you fight in MTG, so I wouldn't be against it.
I doubt Theros will have god stats. There will be mythic creatures, but I think they'll be more champions of the gods and Nyx creatures. Eldrazi are probably around CR 30, or at least the very powerful ones. They could easily stat out some of the lower powered Eldrazi, and possibly some higher powered ones if they were to do an Innistrad book. If they do Innistrad or Zendikar, they'll have to do Eldrazi stats because they're major villains.
5e isn't big on statting out gods. We only have Tiamat, and she's in 2 adventures. Gods normally aren't antagonists in adventures, and you normally don't get to fight or slay them, so WotC normally doesn't stat them out.
Emrakul might not get stats because she's the most powerful Eldrazi, but the others might. As for gods not normally being antagonists, in Theros, gods like Thassa and Heliod had been very active antagonists towards one planeswalker or another in the plane's story. I know this might not be translated to D&D, but these gods aren't as separate from the world as the usual D&D pantheons are. In Amonkhet, the gods literally walk among the people.
Thanks for clarifying. Eldrazi would be difficult to bring to 5e, but they could end up similar to the Daelkyr from Ebberon, as evil abberation overlords. Just weirder and more powerful.
If Theros has actual stat blocks and such for the Theros gods, giving stats and abilities to the Eldrazi titans' avatars should be easier. These are all creatures you fight in MTG, so I wouldn't be against it.
I doubt Theros will have god stats. There will be mythic creatures, but I think they'll be more champions of the gods and Nyx creatures. Eldrazi are probably around CR 30, or at least the very powerful ones. They could easily stat out some of the lower powered Eldrazi, and possibly some higher powered ones if they were to do an Innistrad book. If they do Innistrad or Zendikar, they'll have to do Eldrazi stats because they're major villains.
5e isn't big on statting out gods. We only have Tiamat, and she's in 2 adventures. Gods normally aren't antagonists in adventures, and you normally don't get to fight or slay them, so WotC normally doesn't stat them out.
Emrakul might not get stats because she's the most powerful Eldrazi, but the others might.
Yeah.
Well, anyway, this is kind of off topic. They never playtest monsters in UA.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
well its more that both rely heavily on intelegence, all rune knights have proficiency in smiths tools and their runes must be attached to their armor and weapons to be useful to them, sort of like infusions, as they gain levels they gain more runes and can infuse more runes, yeah it is not quite like infusions since they are not magic items and the fighter can grow like giant, but still
i am soup, with too many ideas (all of them very spicy) who has made sufficient homebrew material and character to last an thousand human lifetimes
A giant themed barbarian that can increase in size would be great. Ideally aimed towards unarmed/grappling for my tastes but different ordning could offer some variation in play style. There's a path of the jotunkin on the homebrew forum that looks pretty fun (with a little bit of down tuning)
I think we will start to see UA for things that will line up with the next MtG setting. We got Ravnica around the time of the Guilds of Ravnica/Ravnica Allegiance, then they announced the Theros book around the release of Theros: Beyond Death block. So it won't be Ikora, Zendikar or the expansion after that, but the next one there after I think.
She/Her Player and Dungeon Master
I wouldn’t have thought the next book after this will be another MTG book, else they’ll probably get a load of flak
I was only making a joke!!
Creating Epic Boons on DDB
DDB Buyers' Guide
Hardcovers, DDB & You
Content Troubleshooting
You may have been joking, but it kind of lines up. In 18 months I really believe that you will see another MtG book that will match up with the MtG block.
She/Her Player and Dungeon Master
Yeah, in 18 months. Us getting another M:tG setting right after Theros was the joke.
Creating Epic Boons on DDB
DDB Buyers' Guide
Hardcovers, DDB & You
Content Troubleshooting
I think it will work out to every third book or so.
I am just thinking about what the UAs will look like in the next few months.
She/Her Player and Dungeon Master
Agreed on both counts
Creating Epic Boons on DDB
DDB Buyers' Guide
Hardcovers, DDB & You
Content Troubleshooting
I think the next M:tG setting will be Innistrad, based on a tweet from Chris Perkins last year. He said that if you liked Curse of Strahd, you'd like a book they were working on for 2020. That makes me think of either Innistrad or Planescape, because Barovia is technically in the shadowfell. If they are working on Innistrad, I'd expect a fleshmancer artificer subclass to come out fairly soon.
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Spells, Monsters, Subclasses, Races, Arcknight Class, Occultist Class, World, Enigmatic Esoterica forms
I'm hoping for Innistrad. Stichers, the Doctor Frankenstein-esque zombie artificers, would be a cool branching out for the Artificer class. (We need more artificer subclasses.) I think that they will do planescape, and probably before Innistrad, but I doubt that it is related to the Perkins tweet. Yes, Barovia is in the Shadowfell, but wasn't planescape more about the outer planes and Sigil? Also, if they gave us Innistrad, we might get official Eldrazi stat blocks. That would be great.
A fool pulls the leaves. A brute chops the trunk. A sage digs the roots.
My Improved Lineage System
It was primarily about the Outer Planes and Sigil, but all the planes outside the Material Plane are part of the Planescape setting.
I would like stitchers/fleshmancers for an artificer. Would be cool. I don't think we'll get another M:tG setting in 2020, but maybe by the end of 2021. (We do need more Artificer subclasses. This is also why I want the Archivist back.)
Planescape is normally more about the outer planes and sigil, but the inner planes still are a large part of it. I don't think perkins was referencing planescape in that tweet, I'm still not sure what he was talking about, but I would like planescape before Innistrad as well, and I do think Planescape will come by the end of the year.
Eldrazi could be cool to bring to 5e, but I don't know how many players would understand what they are.
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Spells, Monsters, Subclasses, Races, Arcknight Class, Occultist Class, World, Enigmatic Esoterica forms
Yes, exactly. A planescape handbook would probably have Genasi and Eladrin reprinted in the book, and they're related to the inner planes.
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Spells, Monsters, Subclasses, Races, Arcknight Class, Occultist Class, World, Enigmatic Esoterica forms
Thanks for clarifying. Eldrazi would be difficult to bring to 5e, but they could end up similar to the Daelkyr from Ebberon, as evil abberation overlords. Just weirder and more powerful.
A fool pulls the leaves. A brute chops the trunk. A sage digs the roots.
My Improved Lineage System
Definition of Aberration Overlords from any campaign setting: (My own definition)
"Any weirds otherworldly creature with multiple eyeballs, tentacles, arms, or other 'gross' parts of nature that has significant power."
Eldrazi, Daelkyr, Elder Evils, and other aberrations from any D&D settings are very similar in theme.
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Spells, Monsters, Subclasses, Races, Arcknight Class, Occultist Class, World, Enigmatic Esoterica forms
If Theros has actual stat blocks and such for the Theros gods, giving stats and abilities to the Eldrazi titans' avatars should be easier. These are all creatures you fight in MTG, so I wouldn't be against it.
I doubt Theros will have god stats. There will be mythic creatures, but I think they'll be more champions of the gods and Nyx creatures. Eldrazi are probably around CR 30, or at least the very powerful ones. They could easily stat out some of the lower powered Eldrazi, and possibly some higher powered ones if they were to do an Innistrad book. If they do Innistrad or Zendikar, they'll have to do Eldrazi stats because they're major villains.
5e isn't big on statting out gods. We only have Tiamat, and she's in 2 adventures. Gods normally aren't antagonists in adventures, and you normally don't get to fight or slay them, so WotC normally doesn't stat them out.
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Spells, Monsters, Subclasses, Races, Arcknight Class, Occultist Class, World, Enigmatic Esoterica forms
Emrakul might not get stats because she's the most powerful Eldrazi, but the others might. As for gods not normally being antagonists, in Theros, gods like Thassa and Heliod had been very active antagonists towards one planeswalker or another in the plane's story. I know this might not be translated to D&D, but these gods aren't as separate from the world as the usual D&D pantheons are. In Amonkhet, the gods literally walk among the people.
Yeah.
Well, anyway, this is kind of off topic. They never playtest monsters in UA.
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Spells, Monsters, Subclasses, Races, Arcknight Class, Occultist Class, World, Enigmatic Esoterica forms